Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
19. As expected, no evidence.
Sun Oct 5, 2014, 10:28 PM
Oct 2014

Information concerning the drug is well known and widely available. If it was not, studies could not be conducted, the drug could never make it to market, and it would never have been administered to the two patients, even on an experimental basis.

The manufacturer has also been extensively investigated and interviewed by numerous news sources worldwide. This exposure is good for the company, and they are in the process of producing more of the drug. It does not happen overnight, and it still has not actually been approved for widespread human use. My assertions are not rumor or innuendo, but statements from the company, treating doctors and hospitals, the government, and other relevant and knowledgeable public health and related authorities.

You, on the other hand, just don't trust all "doctors, hospitals, drug companies, etc."

Again, would you care to provide both your qualifications to question the innumerable individuals and institutions who corroborate the drug manufacturer's position, and any actual evidence other than general distrust and belief in conspiracies?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I wonder what it means that the other experimental drug is 'difficult' to take. Chemisse Oct 2014 #1
Yes, is it more difficult to take than dying? jwirr Oct 2014 #2
If I were an Ebola patient I'd want to try it anyway. Louisiana1976 Oct 2014 #4
Yes, so would I. jwirr Oct 2014 #11
I read that it makes people worse before it makes them better -- IF it makes them better. pnwmom Oct 2014 #7
I know. We have watched cancer patients suffer only to die a few months later for a long time. What jwirr Oct 2014 #12
Ahh, that explains it. Ty. Chemisse Oct 2014 #23
he may pull through on his own TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #21
The problem is that it can kill the patient Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #26
Ty for the interesting information. Chemisse Oct 2014 #28
Shit. calimary Oct 2014 #3
I believe your organs liquefy.. PearliePoo2 Oct 2014 #5
They don't liquefy. tammywammy Oct 2014 #6
...and appeared not to be receiving any of the experimental medicines for the virus..... blackspade Oct 2014 #8
They're out of the drug. tammywammy Oct 2014 #13
they ...say... they are out of the drug ... nt quadrature Oct 2014 #15
The drug was experimental and the manufacturer had not even started primate trials. branford Oct 2014 #17
you are repeating somebody-elses claims quadrature Oct 2014 #18
As expected, no evidence. branford Oct 2014 #19
I guess we will see than. blackspade Oct 2014 #20
They are out of the drug, there were only a few doses Marrah_G Oct 2014 #14
there were only about 6 or 7 does of ZMapp made TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #22
Possibly not entirely correct.... blackspade Oct 2014 #24
so half that got ZMapp were presumably white and half were black TorchTheWitch Oct 2014 #25
That's it! you convinced me! blackspade Oct 2014 #27
Spanish priest died. Aerows Oct 2014 #29
Correct, I posted that above. blackspade Oct 2014 #32
And one of the white people died, too Aerows Oct 2014 #30
Praise to the brave medical staff helping to treat him oberliner Oct 2014 #9
How about trying the experimental cure discovered by a Thai hospital? Turborama Oct 2014 #10
One hospital is using AIDS medication Aerows Oct 2014 #31
Serum antibodies from suvivors are supposed to help. McCamy Taylor Oct 2014 #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ebola Patient In Dallas S...»Reply #19