Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: U.S. Now Using Apache Helicopters to Attack ISIS in Iraq [View all]GGJohn
(9,951 posts)31. You'll have to ask Pres. Clinton that question.
But, to be fair, the mission called for dropping the Rangers into the operation area and the Blackhawk is ideally suited for that whereas the Longbow isn't.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, the fixed wing aircraft are basically invulnerable to anything ISIS is likely to have
Ex Lurker
Oct 2014
#1
True they are vulnerable to small arms fire however in this case it might not even have been a risk
cstanleytech
Oct 2014
#6
The question isnt what they used in Afghanistan but rather what did they use to accomplish this one
cstanleytech
Oct 2014
#17
Couldn't they be downed by an RPG? Or whatever else they salvaged from the Iraqis?
freshwest
Oct 2014
#14
He didn't talk about it much, because of what he was literally *doing* you know?
freshwest
Oct 2014
#33
You bring tears to my eyes. I'll tell him. It was easier for us at home to decide what was wrong.
freshwest
Oct 2014
#35
I just called him and told him all you said. He was grateful to be remembered by other veterans.
freshwest
Oct 2014
#68
The flares would be to draw off any heat seeking SAM's or AAM's fired at the aircraft.
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#69
Oh, wow. Thanks for explaining. I certainly don't know about this stuff, although my brother is...
freshwest
Oct 2014
#74
If the air support solely fails I suspect you might be right which is why imo we all should be
cstanleytech
Oct 2014
#18
In my strictly personal opinion, from the moment the decision was made to start an air war
scarletwoman
Oct 2014
#22
Well, yeah - we can go back and back. Like, to the breakup of the Ottoman Empire.
scarletwoman
Oct 2014
#27
It serves a potential purpose which is to try and slow the spread of a group
cstanleytech
Oct 2014
#45
I imagine our people in the Green Zone have their evacuation plans well in hand. nt
scarletwoman
Oct 2014
#21
I believe that those were before the military decided to name their helos after Indian tribes.
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#53
You're right, the Jolly's were Marine helos, and I always thought they were ugly as hell.
GGJohn
Oct 2014
#59
Yes indeed. Nothing jolie about a Jolly (if you don't mind a bilingual pun).
Jackpine Radical
Oct 2014
#62
It certainly seems the "blowing up empty buildings from 30,000 ft" has run it's course
Baclava
Oct 2014
#46
Remember the history texts of them olde timey days when they had those '100 year' wars?
Baclava
Oct 2014
#86
There seems to be very little information out there about what is going on near Baghdad.
amandabeech
Oct 2014
#57
Because the media is being excluded, perhaps? Excellent point about physical safety of camera crews.
freshwest
Oct 2014
#65
It had occurred to me that the media had been asked to downplay whatever was going on in Baghdad.
amandabeech
Oct 2014
#67