Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kiva

(4,373 posts)
31. I'm happy for people in those 11 states.
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 10:35 AM
Oct 2014

But would really prefer the Court to address this issue as a point of national equality. In the 1960s the Court decided Loving v Virginia within that scope, and they need to do so with same sex marriage.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

wow! unblock Oct 2014 #1
Happy for the gay people but Marthe48 Oct 2014 #2
When one of the five dies in office bigdarryl Oct 2014 #3
Democratic President, if I may gently suggest. calimary Oct 2014 #34
It needs to be Tony Fishscales. He's the worst. Ampersand Unicode Oct 2014 #36
looks to me like they are ducking the issue rurallib Oct 2014 #4
It means less than four justices see merit in the appeals. House of Roberts Oct 2014 #7
It more than likely means the Justices do not want to nationalize the issue. former9thward Oct 2014 #8
Were these not state laws the District courts struck down? House of Roberts Oct 2014 #15
No, I believe they want to keep their hands off the issue. former9thward Oct 2014 #17
It is not the states working through these issues Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #19
I know that. former9thward Oct 2014 #23
Their rejection of the cases Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #25
All the cases have gone the marriage equality way... TDale313 Oct 2014 #13
Agreed. Ms. Toad Oct 2014 #21
Ding ding ding! Gelliebeans Oct 2014 #55
Thanks to all for their responses - I tend to look at the right side rurallib Oct 2014 #18
There is no legal conflict for them to resolve right now hack89 Oct 2014 #24
I think a court in Tennessee ruled otherwise. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #27
LGBT people aren't out of the woods yet Ampersand Unicode Oct 2014 #37
I'm having the same type of feeling davidpdx Oct 2014 #67
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh! shenmue Oct 2014 #5
:-) :-) :-) :-) MuseRider Oct 2014 #6
That's nice for the people that live in those states dbackjon Oct 2014 #9
So 30 States now allow same sex marriage while 29 States permit discrimination against LGBT people Bluenorthwest Oct 2014 #10
So that means democrats have to get there ass out and vote the homophobics out bigdarryl Oct 2014 #12
Good News Hawaii Hiker Oct 2014 #11
So, for all practical purposes this means one of the five men... malthaussen Oct 2014 #14
It makes me wonder how the vote on whether to hear the case went davidpdx Oct 2014 #66
Once again, that margin of victory in Virginia was 907 votes. mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2014 #16
You can't stop the bend... yallerdawg Oct 2014 #20
Adding a link, or some links, mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2014 #22
Did Scalia, Scalito, and Thomas all sleep in? yurbud Oct 2014 #26
Anti gay laws don't help business, where as knocking down anti-discrimination laws I housing will. FlatStanley Oct 2014 #28
It's not full Equality yet but... SoapBox Oct 2014 #29
How the "other side" will view this... Bryce Butler Oct 2014 #30
You can't explain that. Ampersand Unicode Oct 2014 #38
I'm happy for people in those 11 states. kiva Oct 2014 #31
Yes, 39 other states may still block SSM. Not cheering yet. More states rights from the RW USSC. freshwest Oct 2014 #44
How could 39 states still block it, given the Federal Court decisions? pnwmom Oct 2014 #48
I believe it goes district by district. The SCOTUS has ruled in I think two districts. And IMO in rhett o rick Oct 2014 #49
By state laws not yet overturned by federal courts. It may be 39 as poster I replied to indicated. freshwest Oct 2014 #52
Exactly, that is how I see it also. It needs to be national, not state by state. uppityperson Oct 2014 #45
DEVELOPING: Same-Sex Marriage ‘Imminent’ in Virginia mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2014 #32
Cowardly advocation of inequality. Feral Child Oct 2014 #33
And a free gift to the GOP... Orsino Oct 2014 #35
Same-Sex Marriage Is Now Legal in the Majority of U.S. States rocktivity Oct 2014 #39
How many districts does that include? nm rhett o rick Oct 2014 #50
The stay has just been lifted in Utah LadyHawkAZ Oct 2014 #40
Gay marriage in Utah, of all places. SpankMe Oct 2014 #41
I can hear the screaming now.... Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #42
Congratulations to all the happy couples Jack Rabbit Oct 2014 #43
I suspect the conservatives may be playing a waiting game onenote Oct 2014 #46
The GOP will use this to fire up the base for the midterm elections. QED Oct 2014 #47
No, they won't brooklynite Oct 2014 #53
Low information voters won't see the nuance. QED Oct 2014 #56
You're delusional if you don't think this will be an issue in NC (Hagan v. Tillis). WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2014 #57
...who going to do what? brooklynite Oct 2014 #58
Surely you're paying attention to the Senator Kay Hagan v. Thom Tillis race in NC? WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2014 #59
Tillis can promise to repeal ACA...what can he do about a precedent setting Supreme Court decision? brooklynite Oct 2014 #61
It doesn't matter what he can actually deliver... WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2014 #69
Republicans really want the gay vote. nt valerief Oct 2014 #51
I wish that they would have taken the case and then legalized gay marriage nation-wide totodeinhere Oct 2014 #54
Excellent gopiscrap Oct 2014 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author tea and oranges Oct 2014 #62
Congratulations! Cha Oct 2014 #63
The only thing they agree on tavernier Oct 2014 #64
The magic number is 30. And that's a majority! Future cases . . . dismissed!!! Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #65
this glimmer of justice barbtries Oct 2014 #68
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Co...»Reply #31