Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage [View all]kiva
(4,373 posts)31. I'm happy for people in those 11 states.
But would really prefer the Court to address this issue as a point of national equality. In the 1960s the Court decided Loving v Virginia within that scope, and they need to do so with same sex marriage.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It more than likely means the Justices do not want to nationalize the issue.
former9thward
Oct 2014
#8
So 30 States now allow same sex marriage while 29 States permit discrimination against LGBT people
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2014
#10
So that means democrats have to get there ass out and vote the homophobics out
bigdarryl
Oct 2014
#12
Anti gay laws don't help business, where as knocking down anti-discrimination laws I housing will.
FlatStanley
Oct 2014
#28
Yes, 39 other states may still block SSM. Not cheering yet. More states rights from the RW USSC.
freshwest
Oct 2014
#44
I believe it goes district by district. The SCOTUS has ruled in I think two districts. And IMO in
rhett o rick
Oct 2014
#49
By state laws not yet overturned by federal courts. It may be 39 as poster I replied to indicated.
freshwest
Oct 2014
#52
Exactly, that is how I see it also. It needs to be national, not state by state.
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#45
You're delusional if you don't think this will be an issue in NC (Hagan v. Tillis).
WorseBeforeBetter
Oct 2014
#57
Surely you're paying attention to the Senator Kay Hagan v. Thom Tillis race in NC?
WorseBeforeBetter
Oct 2014
#59
Tillis can promise to repeal ACA...what can he do about a precedent setting Supreme Court decision?
brooklynite
Oct 2014
#61
I wish that they would have taken the case and then legalized gay marriage nation-wide
totodeinhere
Oct 2014
#54
The magic number is 30. And that's a majority! Future cases . . . dismissed!!!
Major Hogwash
Oct 2014
#65