Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(69,369 posts)32. DEVELOPING: Same-Sex Marriage ‘Imminent’ in Virginia
DEVELOPING: Same-Sex Marriage Imminent in Virginia
by ARLnow.com October 6, 2014 at 11:00 amAG Mark Herring @AGMarkHerring
The 4th Circuit says their mandate will issue at 1 PM & marriages can then begin. What a momentous & joyous day for thousands of Virginians.
Governor Terry McAuliffe issued the following statement regarding the Supreme Court decision:This is a historic and long overdue moment for our Commonwealth and our country. On issues ranging from recognizing same-sex marriages to extending health care benefits to same-sex spouses of state employees, Virginia is already well-prepared to implement this historic decision. Going forward we will act quickly to continue to bring all of our policies and practices into compliance so that we can give marriages between same-sex partners the full faith and credit they deserve.
I applaud all of the Virginians who gave so much time and effort in the fight for equality, and congratulate my friend Attorney General Mark Herring on this important victory for justice and equal treatment under the law.
Equality for all men and women regardless of their race, color, creed or sexual orientation is intrinsic to the values that make us Virginians, and now it is officially inscribed in our laws as well.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It more than likely means the Justices do not want to nationalize the issue.
former9thward
Oct 2014
#8
So 30 States now allow same sex marriage while 29 States permit discrimination against LGBT people
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2014
#10
So that means democrats have to get there ass out and vote the homophobics out
bigdarryl
Oct 2014
#12
Anti gay laws don't help business, where as knocking down anti-discrimination laws I housing will.
FlatStanley
Oct 2014
#28
Yes, 39 other states may still block SSM. Not cheering yet. More states rights from the RW USSC.
freshwest
Oct 2014
#44
I believe it goes district by district. The SCOTUS has ruled in I think two districts. And IMO in
rhett o rick
Oct 2014
#49
By state laws not yet overturned by federal courts. It may be 39 as poster I replied to indicated.
freshwest
Oct 2014
#52
Exactly, that is how I see it also. It needs to be national, not state by state.
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#45
You're delusional if you don't think this will be an issue in NC (Hagan v. Tillis).
WorseBeforeBetter
Oct 2014
#57
Surely you're paying attention to the Senator Kay Hagan v. Thom Tillis race in NC?
WorseBeforeBetter
Oct 2014
#59
Tillis can promise to repeal ACA...what can he do about a precedent setting Supreme Court decision?
brooklynite
Oct 2014
#61
I wish that they would have taken the case and then legalized gay marriage nation-wide
totodeinhere
Oct 2014
#54
The magic number is 30. And that's a majority! Future cases . . . dismissed!!!
Major Hogwash
Oct 2014
#65