Latest Breaking News

rayofreason

(2,259 posts)

42. A very rational position...

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 03:54 PM

Apr 2012

...given that population variations can have significant effects on body chemistry, such as the lactose tolerance in adults you mentioned. And humans continue to evolve.

http://www.lurj.org/article.php/vol4n1/genome.xml

Race certainly does have a social context, but it also overlaps with populations that have different frequencies of specific alleles that might be relevant to things like disease and its treatment, especially if the treatment targets a specific biochemical pathway. Not to consider such issues that could disproportionately impact (negatively) a particular population could be seen as....well.... racist.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Blacks have trouble clearing cervical cancer virus [View all] Omaha Steve Apr 2012 OP

Who are Blacks? The Rugby Team? HipChick Apr 2012 #1

Ask the AP. They wrote the headline. Iris Apr 2012 #2

In the UK dipsydoodle Apr 2012 #3

It's probably the best term to use muriel_volestrangler Apr 2012 #5

"African-American" is not a synonym for "black". Spider Jerusalem Apr 2012 #6

Not all Black people live in America via Africa HotRodTuna Apr 2012 #8

Interesting. Nt xchrom Apr 2012 #4

Sex With Neanderthals: The Ultimate Immunity Boost FarCenter Apr 2012 #7

All the more reason for young people to get the HPV vaccine NickB79 Apr 2012 #9

You may want to read more before you sign your kid up for the vaccine. davsand Apr 2012 #10

I have read extensively about the HPV vaccine NickB79 Apr 2012 #11

Did you bother to READ those articles or did you dismiss them out of hand? davsand Apr 2012 #12

Relying on VAERS, are we? Watch out you don't turn into the Incredible Hulk NickB79 Apr 2012 #43

Blacks should be cautious about calls for mass inoculations. MD20 Apr 2012 #13

Technically, there are no "pure" white or black genes... antigone382 Apr 2012 #21

Race is horseshit, and therefore racial correlations are horseshit too. bemildred Apr 2012 #14

Ever heard of a caucasian getting sickle cell anemia? Beacool Apr 2012 #15

"Caucasian" is also horseshit. bemildred Apr 2012 #16

I'm not going to argue. Beacool Apr 2012 #18

OK. nt bemildred Apr 2012 #24

Look, it's like thinking if a dog has brown hair, then you know something about it's metabolism. bemildred Apr 2012 #17

If those genetic markers were not evenly distributed in all types of dogs hack89 Apr 2012 #20

Yeah, I know about that, but those are just statistical correlations. bemildred Apr 2012 #22

If I was a public health official hack89 Apr 2012 #27

The problem is that populations don't develop diseases. bemildred Apr 2012 #30

Multifactorial polygenic diseases hack89 Apr 2012 #32

Which still happens only to individuals. bemildred Apr 2012 #33

But two individuals from seperate groups may require different treatments for the same disease. hack89 Apr 2012 #35

I really think we have wrung all the juice out of this for the moment. bemildred Apr 2012 #38

Just think in terms of genetic groups and it is less of an issue. hack89 Apr 2012 #40

That's really all I'm saying, just leave race out of it. bemildred Apr 2012 #41

A very rational position... rayofreason Apr 2012 #42

Genetics determines lots of things. bemildred Apr 2012 #34

Yes they do. hack89 Apr 2012 #36

Here is the argument I'm making: bemildred Apr 2012 #39

Humans are divided into numerous distinct genetic groups called haplogroups. hack89 Apr 2012 #19

Right, and we've been mixing them all together rapidly for the last 500 years. bemildred Apr 2012 #23

Wrong hack89 Apr 2012 #25

A couple of centuries HAVE undone millions of years of evolution already. bemildred Apr 2012 #26

Except genetically halogroups are still there hack89 Apr 2012 #28

There is no evidence that any of those events have impacted the human genome. nt hack89 Apr 2012 #29

Right. bemildred Apr 2012 #31

I wouldn't say millions of years, more like about 100 to 50 thousand years ago when humans... Humanist_Activist Apr 2012 #37

Interesting thread. After a review I tend to agree with Liber-AL Apr 2012 #44

Hey. bemildred Apr 2012 #45

YW Liber-AL Apr 2012 #46