Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Feminist cancels talk at USU after guns allowed despite shooting threat [View all]DetlefK
(16,670 posts)1. I thought it only takes working in some sort of industry and being responsible for several underlings to count as a businessman/-woman.
2. Who exactly humiliates her in open discussions? Can you please list some of those "reasoned criticisms" that she refuses to engage?
3. You might have a point there: She's just a fickle woman who doesn't know what she wants: First she gets an appearance at the USU. Then the audience at USU would be so hostile that she would have to face critical questions like "Feminism is a mental illness! Go home, you Feminazi!". Then she gets all nervous, because she's a fickle woman and has not thought through that appearing in front of an audience might bring her in contact with that audience. Then she decides to back out of the appearance, but she can't just claim to be sick or to have an emergency in the family. So she hatches the dastardly plan to get a new E-Mail-account and send a terrorist threat to the USU, because there's no way this could backfire. Then she asks the police and university to take precautions so she can still hold her talk. And then she takes advantage of legal loophole that allows people to bring guns to an event where a mass-shooting has been announced. And finally she can back out of a public appearance that she never wanted to begin with.
4. You have proof that she uses sockpuppet-accounts to send threats to herself? WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR? EXPOSE THAT VILE HAG!
5. Anita Sarkeesian a misandrist. I am shocked and saddened to hear that. Please provide some examples where she said/insinuated/implied that men (in general or with respect to a specific specimen) are inferior to women and I will join you with utmost outrage post-haste.