Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
73. Your model & terminology are overly simplistic & out of date.
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 06:57 PM
Oct 2014

Here's the "better background" you requested.

http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2014/09/commentary-health-workers-need-optimal-respiratory-protection-ebola
How are infectious diseases transmitted via aerosols?

Medical and infection control professionals have relied for years on a paradigm for aerosol transmission of infectious diseases based on very outmoded research and an overly simplistic interpretation of the data. In the 1940s and 50s, William F. Wells and other "aerobiologists" employed now significantly out-of-date sampling methods (eg, settling plates) and very blunt analytic approaches (eg, cell culturing) to understand the movement of bacterial aerosols in healthcare and other settings. Their work, though groundbreaking at the time, provides a very incomplete picture.

Early aerobiologists were not able to measure small particles near an infectious person and thus assumed such particles existed only far from the source. They concluded that organisms capable of aerosol transmission (termed "airborne&quot can only do so at around 3 feet or more from the source. Because they thought that only larger particles would be present near the source, they believed people would be exposed only via large "droplets" on their face, eyes, or nose.

Modern research, using more sensitive instruments and analytic methods, has shown that aerosols emitted from the respiratory tract contain a wide distribution of particle sizes—including many that are small enough to be inhaled.5,6 Thus, both small and large particles will be present near an infectious person.

The chance of large droplets reaching the facial mucous membranes is quite small, as the nasal openings are small and shielded by their external and internal structure. Although close contact may permit large-droplet exposure, it also maximizes the possibility of aerosol inhalation.

As noted by early aerobiologists, liquid in a spray aerosol, such as that generated during coughing or sneezing, will quickly evaporate, which increases the concentration of small particles in the aerosol. Because evaporation occurs in milliseconds, many of these particles are likely to be found near the infectious person.

The current paradigm also assumes that only "small" particles (less than 5 micrometers [mcm]) can be inhaled and deposited in the respiratory tract. This is not true. Particles as large as 100 mcm (and perhaps even larger) can be inhaled into the mouth and nose. Larger particles are deposited in the nasal passages, pharynx, and upper regions of the lungs, while smaller particles are more likely to deposit in the lower, alveolar regions. And for many pathogens, infection is possible regardless of the particle size or deposition site.

It's time to abandon the old paradigm of three mutually exclusive transmission routes for a new one that considers the full range of particle sizes both near and far from a source. In addition, we need to factor in other important features of infectivity, such as the ability of a pathogen to remain viable in air at room temperature and humidity and the likelihood that systemic disease can result from deposition of infectious particles in the respiratory system or their transfer to the gastrointestinal tract.

]We recommend using "aerosol transmissible" rather than the outmoded terms "droplet" or "airborne" to describe pathogens that can transmit disease via infectious particles suspended in air.

Altogether, these epidemiologic and experimental data offer enough evidence to suggest that Ebola and other filoviruses may be opportunistic with respect to aerosol transmission.28 That is, other routes of entry may be more important and probable, but, given the right conditions, it is possible that transmission could also occur via aerosols.

Guidance from the CDC and WHO recommends the use of facemasks for healthcare workers providing routine care to patients with Ebola virus disease and respirators when aerosol-generating procedures are performed. (Interestingly, the 1998 WHO and CDC infection-control guidance for viral hemorrhagic fevers in Africa, still available on the CDC Web site, recommends the use of respirators.)

Facemasks, however, do not offer protection against inhalation of small infectious aerosols, because they lack adequate filters and do not fit tightly against the face.1 Therefore, a higher level of protection is necessary.

To summarize, for the following reasons we believe that Ebola could be an opportunistic aerosol-transmissible disease requiring adequate respiratory protection:

Patients and procedures generate aerosols, and Ebola virus remains viable in aerosols for up to 90 minutes.
All sizes of aerosol particles are easily inhaled both near to and far from the patient.
Crowding, limited air exchange, and close interactions with patients all contribute to the probability that healthcare workers will be exposed to high concentrations of very toxic infectious aerosols.
Ebola targets immune response cells found in all epithelial tissues, including in the respiratory and gastrointestinal system.
Experimental data support aerosols as a mode of disease transmission in non-human primates.

Risk level and working conditions suggest that a PAPR will be more protective, cost-effective, and comfortable than an N95 filtering facepiece respirator.

Acknowledgements

We thank Kathleen Harriman, PhD, MPH, RN, Chief, Vaccine Preventable Diseases Epidemiology Section, Immunization Branch, California Department of Public Health, and Nicole Vars McCullough, PhD, CIH, Manager, Global Technical Services, Personal Safety Division, 3M Company, for their input and review.

References

Oberg L, Brosseau LM. Surgical mask filter and fit performance. Am J Infect Control 2008 May;36(4):276-82 [Abstract]
CDC. Ebola hemorrhagic fever: transmission. 2014 Aug 13 [Full text]
ECDC. Outbreak of Ebola virus disease in West Africa: third update, 1 August 2014. Stockholm: ECDC 2014 Aug 1 [Full text]
Martin-Moreno JM, Llinas G, Hernandez JM. Is respiratory protection appropriate in the Ebola response? Lancet 2014 Sep 6;384(9946):856 [Full text]
Papineni RS, Rosenthal FS. The size distribution of droplets in the exhaled breath of healthy human subjects. J Aerosol Med 1997;10(2):105-16 [Abstract]
Chao CYH, Wan MP, Morawska L, et al. Characterization of expiration air jets and droplet size distributions immediately at the mouth opening. J Aerosol Sci 2009 Feb;40(2):122-33 [Abstract]
Nicas M, Nazaroff WW, Hubbard A. Toward understanding the risk of secondary airborne infection: emission of respirable pathogens. J Occup Environ Hyg 2005 Mar;2(3):143-54 [Abstract]
Bauchsch DG, Towner JS, Dowell SF, et al. Assessment of the risk of Ebola virus transmission from bodily fluids and fomites. J Infect Dis 2007;196:S142-7 [Full text]
Formenty P, Leroy EM, Epelboin A, et al. Detection of Ebola virus in oral fluid specimens during outbreaks of Ebola virus hemorrhagic fever in the Republic of Congo. Clin Infect Dis 2006 Jun;42(11):1521-6 [Full text]
Francesconi P, Yoti Z, Declich S, et al. Ebola hemorrhagic fever transmission and risk factors of contacts, Uganda. Emerg Infect Dis 2003 Nov;9(11):1430-7 [Full text]
Dowell SF, Mukunu R, Ksiazek TG, et al. Transmission of Ebola hemorrhagic fever: a study of risk factors in family members, Kikwit, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1995. J Infect Dis 1999 Feb;179:S87-91 [Full text]
Roels TH, Bloom AS, Buffington J, et al. Ebola hemorrhagic fever, Kikwit, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1995: risk factors for patients without a reported exposure. J Infect Dis 1999 Feb;179:S92-7 [Full text]
Kuhl A, Hoffmann M, Muller MA, et al. Comparative analysis of Ebola virus glycoprotein interactions with human and bat cells. J Infect Dis 2011 Nov;204:S840-9 [Full text]
Hunt CL, Lennemann NJ, Maury W. Filovirus entry: a novelty in the viral fusion world. Viruses 2012 Feb;4(2):258-75 [Full text]
Bray M, Geisbert TW. Ebola virus: the role of macrophages and dendritic cells in the pathogenesis of Ebola hemorrhagic fever. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2005 Aug;37(8):1560-6 [Full text]
Mohamadzadeh M, Chen L, Schmaljohn AL. How Ebola and Marburg viruses battle the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2007 Jul;7(7):556-67 [Abstract]
Lindsley WG, Blachere FM, Thewlis RE, et al. Measurements of airborne influenza virus in aerosol particles from human coughs. PLoS One 2010 Nov 30;5(11):e15100 [Full text]
Caul EO. Small round structured viruses: airborne transmission and hospital control. Lancet 1994 May 21;343(8908):1240-2 [Full text]
Chadwick PR, Walker M, Rees AE. Airborne transmission of a small round structured virus. Lancet 1994 Jan 15;343(8890):171 [Full text]
Best EL, Snadoe JA, Wilcox MH. Potential for aerosolization of Clostridium difficile after flushing toilets: the role of toilet lids in reducing environmental contamination. J Hosp Infect 2012 Jan;80(1):1-5 [Full text]
Gerba CP, Wallis C, Melnick JL. Microbiological hazards of household toilets: droplet production and the fate of residual organisms. Appl Microbiol 1975 Aug;30(2):229-37 [Full text]
Barker J, Jones MV. The potential spread of infection caused by aerosol contamination of surfaces after flushing a domestic toilet. J Appl Microbiol 2005;99(2):339-47 [Full text]
Piercy TJ, Smither SJ, Steward JA, et al. The survival of filoviruses in liquids, on solid substrates and in a dynamic aerosol. J Appl Microbiol 2010 Nov;109(5):1531-9 [Full text]
Jaax N, Jahrling P, Geisbert T, et al. Transmission of Ebola virus (Zaire strain) to uninfected control monkeys in a biocontainment laboratory. Lancet 1995 Dec 23-30;346(8991-2):1669-71 [Abstract]
Kobinger GP, Leung A, Neufeld J, et al. Replication, pathogenicity, shedding and transmission of Zaire ebolavirus in pigs. J Infect Dis 2011 Jul 15;204(2):200-8 [Full text]
Weingartl HM, Embury-Hyatt C, Nfon C, et al. Transmission of Ebola virus from pigs to non-human primates. Sci Rep 2012;2:811 [Full text]
Reed DS, Lackemeyer MG, Garza NL, et al. Aerosol exposure to Zaire Ebolavirus in three nonhuman primate species: differences in disease course and clinical pathology. Microb Infect 2011 Oct;13(11) 30-6 [Abstract]
Roy CJ, Milton DK. Airborne transmission of communicable infection—the elusive pathway. N Engl J Med 2004 Apr;350(17):1710-2 [Preview]
Canadian Standards Association. Selection, use and care of respirators. CAN/CSA Z94.4-11
Wolz A. Face to face with Ebola—an emergency care center in Sierra Leone. (Perspective) N Engl J Med 2014 Aug 27 [Full text]


No radiation like the mail got for anthrax? Downwinder Oct 2014 #1
Best response yet - taking measures out of an abundance of caution - that is what is needed. Justice Oct 2014 #2
That is what is lacking with this CDC. Baitball Blogger Oct 2014 #22
"this CDC"? Darb Oct 2014 #34
There's nothing peculiar about the wording. Baitball Blogger Oct 2014 #36
"This" CDC implies it is different than other CDCs, Darb Oct 2014 #55
Each team has its own challenges. Baitball Blogger Oct 2014 #58
He probably means "the black man's CDC". Just a wild-assed guess. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #59
Shame on you kestrel. Baitball Blogger Oct 2014 #61
Divernan Diclotican Oct 2014 #3
"whether the Ebola virus has mutated" Android3.14 Oct 2014 #4
Those who don't believe in evolution think this is fear mongering. mnhtnbb Oct 2014 #5
Thank you for an informed & factual contribution to the discussion. Divernan Oct 2014 #11
Citations please for viruses that mutated to different forms of transmission. Bluenorthwest Oct 2014 #39
Stick to the issue Android3.14 Oct 2014 #45
I am sticking to the issue. mnhtnbb Oct 2014 #50
ALL viruses mutate. It's what viruses do. NickB79 Oct 2014 #66
Ebola mutates all the time. And VIROLOGISTS are pretty fucking sure that it's physically impossible kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #60
self delete mnhtnbb Oct 2014 #67
Your model & terminology are overly simplistic & out of date. Divernan Oct 2014 #73
See post 9. Try not to be terrified of facing reality. Divernan Oct 2014 #10
Can you expand upon.... LovingA2andMI Oct 2014 #23
What do you mean "whether the Ebola virus has mutated such that it is more contagious?" morningfog Oct 2014 #6
All biologists know that viruses DO mutate. Ebola is no exception. There are no exceptions. Divernan Oct 2014 #9
So, no evidence. blackspade Oct 2014 #16
Ebola would be unique among all life forms on the planet if it did not undergo mutation MNBrewer Oct 2014 #18
Do you also fear that HIV, also mutating, is going to leap at you one day from across the room? Bluenorthwest Oct 2014 #43
There simply is no evidence of such. AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #62
I don't "also fear" that, because I never said that I feared that ebola would do the same MNBrewer Oct 2014 #74
Post 5: 300 new mutations which have yet to be studied re transmission Divernan Oct 2014 #19
Thank you for this clear information and EVIDENCE.... LovingA2andMI Oct 2014 #24
Can't we just say "evolved", or have the right-wingers succeeded in turning that into an obscenity? Towlie Oct 2014 #27
None. Because none exists. nt AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #65
Good move. Smart to be proactive AND smart to realize how scared many folks are. peacebird Oct 2014 #7
I hope the people cleaning this plane are protected. Paper Roses Oct 2014 #8
If it Ebola is that contagious, it's too late HockeyMom Oct 2014 #31
The only issue I have with the OP... blackspade Oct 2014 #12
Post 5: Researchers have identified more than 300 new viral mutations in the latest strain of Ebola, Divernan Oct 2014 #14
Five co-authors of the article in Science contracted Ebola and lost their battle with it mnhtnbb Oct 2014 #20
This ebola epidemic spike91nz Oct 2014 #13
Brilliant analysis! Welcome to DU Divernan Oct 2014 #15
Welcome to DU - TBF Oct 2014 #17
As a M.B.A. degree individual this analysis.... LovingA2andMI Oct 2014 #25
Agree with you 100% n/t PasadenaTrudy Oct 2014 #35
This is like telling Timmy that Lassie has died. Vinca Oct 2014 #21
You're missing the spoiler alert! Renew Deal Oct 2014 #29
Lassie is a girl marions ghost Oct 2014 #30
Nit picky here NV Whino Oct 2014 #37
Lassie was referred to by the term "she" marions ghost Oct 2014 #40
Well, I can, but won't argue that. NV Whino Oct 2014 #47
Hollywood in general marions ghost Oct 2014 #49
PR move YarnAddict Oct 2014 #26
Since normally they only give 7 minutes to clean a plane they need the PR. gvstn Oct 2014 #33
Imagine getting the phone call saying you sat in the same seat Renew Deal Oct 2014 #28
... unless she puked, spit or shat all over it, I wouldn't be too concerned. Myrina Oct 2014 #53
If the nurse was symptomatic, then she should be charged with a crime. SpankMe Oct 2014 #32
She checked first w/ CDC re a slightly elevated temp; they told her she could fly. Divernan Oct 2014 #38
Oh My God!!!!! LeftInTX Oct 2014 #48
SpankMe is correct. SoapBox Oct 2014 #42
Of course she did! She should have had the brains to have called 911, from her mother's house! SoapBox Oct 2014 #41
It does seem qutie strange when you think about it. AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #64
I'm actually weirdly comforted by the fact that no one has tested positive catbyte Oct 2014 #44
This, just this. AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #63
I see you edited the OP to remove the crazy statements Android3.14 Oct 2014 #46
I didn't edit the OP /link & there were no "crazy statements". Divernan Oct 2014 #71
amazing CullenBohannon Oct 2014 #51
I sense she has suspicions of having Ebola. FarPoint Oct 2014 #52
The kind of denial we see here in posts accusing people of panic. Divernan Oct 2014 #54
Overstated, Darb Oct 2014 #56
Not seeing anyone who says the CDC has it under perfect control Man from Pickens Oct 2014 #72
Enough with the "ZOMG EBOLA IS MUTATING" nonsense. Ebola mutates daily. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #57
Not true. There is disagreement about its ability to mutate to a strain that could be mnhtnbb Oct 2014 #68
Impressively detailed and scientifically current analysis of Ebola mutation/transmission Divernan Oct 2014 #69
Here are topic headings from this article. Divernan Oct 2014 #70
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CDC: Ebola patient may ha...»Reply #73