Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And this is why . . . markpkessinger Oct 2014 #1
I say - let them split. Their hateful side has been paving their way to hell blm Oct 2014 #2
Sad to say, but a Synod on Family Life that was hedgehog Oct 2014 #3
Too true: "Openness to life is an intrinsic requirement of married love" muriel_volestrangler Oct 2014 #5
This is not unlike the stacking of conservative judges on the Supreme and other courts ... kwassa Oct 2014 #22
Exactly. hedgehog Oct 2014 #26
The mischaracterization of Francis' 'who am I to judge' as having been said about 'gays' is getting Bluenorthwest Oct 2014 #4
Thank you theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #14
Can you link to a good source of info re comments about the gay lobby? beam me up scottie Oct 2014 #19
Thank you. Jamastiene Oct 2014 #27
WHAT??!! But here on DU Francis is being hailed as a Lovable Liberal!! Arugula Latte Oct 2014 #34
This was just a PR stunt. gerogie2 Oct 2014 #6
That is an exceedingly cynical view. I think it reflects serious division in the Church. Comrade Grumpy Oct 2014 #7
Right now official teachings come in a top down fashion that hedgehog Oct 2014 #9
I agree Comrade Grumpy... Johnyawl Oct 2014 #10
No, it's not that cynical theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #15
I dont think it was a PR stunt; I think Francis was unprepared for the hedgehog Oct 2014 #12
And yet Chris Matthews and other Francis supporters hit the airwaves hard and fast declaring that Bluenorthwest Oct 2014 #30
I think what that reflected wasn't PR so much as wishful thinking hedgehog Oct 2014 #31
The Church will stay mired in its 16th Century viewpoints. blkmusclmachine Oct 2014 #8
16th Century? You give some of these guys too much credit! hedgehog Oct 2014 #11
Archbishop Cordileone is probably popping a cork as I type theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #16
It took the church centuries to admit Galileo was right, even when faced with hard scientific Rozlee Oct 2014 #23
Churches could be helpful in bonding people together and making a better life for RKP5637 Oct 2014 #13
I was a cradle Roman Catholic, but now I am an Episcopalian. hedgehog Oct 2014 #32
Always be true to your roots! SoapBox Oct 2014 #17
Pissy pedophile bishops. nt valerief Oct 2014 #18
the catholic church is the gayest organization in the history of ever. redruddyred Oct 2014 #25
You have a strange idea of what a gay organization really is. Jamastiene Oct 2014 #28
Thank you. /nt yardwork Oct 2014 #38
excuse me redruddyred Oct 2014 #41
While there's certainly a lot of repressed homoeroticism there, calling it a "gay organization" - nomorenomore08 Oct 2014 #29
I don't know. redruddyred Oct 2014 #42
The Pope strikes back wilsonbooks Oct 2014 #20
What do these wankers think Jesus was doing, hanging around with 12 guys. Hoppy Oct 2014 #21
and they wonder why the kids become atheists. redruddyred Oct 2014 #24
the church of the inquisition remains the church of the inquisition dembotoz Oct 2014 #33
So - can people never change? can organizations mever change? hedgehog Oct 2014 #35
could but has not--as is as was dembotoz Oct 2014 #37
Well, gee, not so much with the Catholic Church, it seems. Let's take a look: Arugula Latte Oct 2014 #39
I'd have no problem with.. sendero Oct 2014 #36
Considering most bishops are likely gay, am I the only one seeing irony closeupready Oct 2014 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Catholic bishops reject w...»Reply #8