Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Blacks have trouble clearing cervical cancer virus [View all]NickB79
(20,397 posts)43. Relying on VAERS, are we? Watch out you don't turn into the Incredible Hulk
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2008/01/how_vaccine_litigation_distorts_the_vaer.php
Anyone who relies heavily on VAERS rather than the peer-reviewed, published science shows just how little they know about how the scientific research community works.
BTW, I have a degree in biochemistry. I've wasted entire weekends reading the same misconceptions like those found in your post over the years, and despite all the evidence to the contrary it never seems to change. Funny that.
Unfortunately, the VAERS database is highly unreliable. The reason is that anyone can submit a report to it, and no one actually verifies the accuracy of the report. Indeed, James Laidler once tested the system by submitting a report that the influenza virus had turned him into The Incredible Hulk. The report was accepted and duly entered into the database. This report was so out of the ordinary that a representative actually contacted him and, amazingly, asked his permission to remove the report from the database (proving that it's not easy being green). If Laidler had not given it, the report of an adverse reaction in which the flu vaccine turned a man into a huge, immensely powerful green monster would still be in VAERS. Now, via Kathleen Seidel, who alerted me to this, comes more evidence of the corruption of the VAERS database. This evidence comes in the form of a study by Michael J. Goodman and James Nordin published in the most recent issue of the journal Pediatrics, in which the authors examine the question of how much of the seeming increase in autism related to vaccines reported to the VAERS database over the last several years might be related to litigation. Naturally, I couldn't resist downloading the complete article and reading it.
Anyone who relies heavily on VAERS rather than the peer-reviewed, published science shows just how little they know about how the scientific research community works.
BTW, I have a degree in biochemistry. I've wasted entire weekends reading the same misconceptions like those found in your post over the years, and despite all the evidence to the contrary it never seems to change. Funny that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Look, it's like thinking if a dog has brown hair, then you know something about it's metabolism.
bemildred
Apr 2012
#17
But two individuals from seperate groups may require different treatments for the same disease.
hack89
Apr 2012
#35
Right, and we've been mixing them all together rapidly for the last 500 years.
bemildred
Apr 2012
#23
There is no evidence that any of those events have impacted the human genome. nt
hack89
Apr 2012
#29
I wouldn't say millions of years, more like about 100 to 50 thousand years ago when humans...
Humanist_Activist
Apr 2012
#37