Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Evidence supports officer’s account of shooting in Ferguson [View all]bl968
(360 posts)41. Still does not make a bit of difference.
Multiple witnesses including several white construction workers have all testified that he turned with his hands in the air that he was saying ok ok. When the officer shot him.
It makes absolutely no difference if the hands are held out to the side or up above his head as long as they were empty, and he was out of physical reach of the officer. I would definitely say 30-60' qualifies as out of physical reach; and so the officer had no further cause to fear for his life removing the lethal force option.
The officer had no further justification for shooting him from the moment he started fleeing, he murdered this kid in cold blood.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I suppose so. I haven't been exactly thrilled with any news publications recently.
bravenak
Oct 2014
#8
In fairness to some of the front line reporters for the WP, they published a masterful
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#12
What crap. How was Wilson's life threatened as he fired the 10th shot into Brown's head?
SunSeeker
Oct 2014
#3
Assuming that Brown was suicidal and did reach for Wilson's weapon just because Wilson
Chakab
Oct 2014
#6
Oh, man, somebody at the WP has been smoking something, that's for sure. - nt
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#11
I think the technical term is "delusions", which is where the "paranoia" line comes from
Recursion
Oct 2014
#60
It was reported as being in line with the larger demographics of the area
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#29
Why not roll up the window? Why not call for back up? Why not drive away and return with help?
freshwest
Oct 2014
#62
OK, name another plausible situation in which his hand would be close to the gun when fired
Travelman
Oct 2014
#96
Follow the evidence, not the emotion. (Leave the latter to the tea partiers.) The question to be
pampango
Oct 2014
#38
Way too much emotional investment in this for most people to be that logical
FLPanhandle
Oct 2014
#44
No eyewitness, not one, says Brown was 'charging' Wilson. The autopsy does NOT
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#73
You're telling lies yet again, so much so that all your comments should be discarded. The
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#75
Are you seriously disputing that Wilson shot at Brown, i.e., at Brown's back, while
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#79
Please identify even one of these witnesses who claim Brown was 'charging'
KingCharlemagne
Oct 2014
#86
With Trayvon you get simmering rage; with Mike Brown, it boils over a bit
alcibiades_mystery
Oct 2014
#57