Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sugarcoated

(8,240 posts)
17. Actually it looks to me
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 11:53 AM
Oct 2014

like you just want to make that assumption. My rights to be safe are just as important as the right to bear arms.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's insane, Suich Oct 2014 #1
No, not just you Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #2
The law is only about standing to sue. branford Oct 2014 #4
Actually it looks to me Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #17
written as someone who has never been sued dsc Oct 2014 #19
I agree with you Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #21
You really didn't address my point. branford Oct 2014 #20
What I see Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #22
So you think it's a good idea to have every county/city/town within a state to make it's own GGJohn Oct 2014 #24
If this isn't the NRA and gun extremists Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #25
It's an attempt to get uniform laws across the state and not make more criminals GGJohn Oct 2014 #27
If that's the case, then I'm not opposed to that Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #50
The new PA law changes absolutely nothing about current gun restrictions or safety. branford Oct 2014 #26
I support common sense gun safety laws Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #42
That's fine, and you're certainly welcome to advocate any position you wish. branford Oct 2014 #46
I stopped reading after the first line of your post Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #48
no sense arguing with a hell-bent gunner. notrightatall Oct 2014 #51
Sure seems that way, doesn't it? Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #52
Odd. They would have to sue in state court because a plaintiff who has been harmed is a requirement merrily Oct 2014 #3
Standing has been a constant issue in the law happyslug Oct 2014 #13
These GunNutters are going to be the death of this country. SoapBox Oct 2014 #5
Another ALEC plot? SoapBox Oct 2014 #6
Insanity. blkmusclmachine Oct 2014 #7
Gun laws or any laws more restrictive than state law? Downwinder Oct 2014 #8
"without having to find actual plaintiffs who can demonstrate that they've been harmed by the law" Volaris Oct 2014 #9
I almost thought this is onion-worthy satire... TRoN33 Oct 2014 #10
PA is going crazy with right-wing legislation at the moment. They must be trying to enough Oct 2014 #11
PA is controlled by teabaggers. Governor, State House, State Senate, 13/18 US House Reps, and AlinPA Oct 2014 #12
Well, the writing is on the wall for Corbett Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #15
Disagree. He is an ignorant stupid teabagger. AlinPA Oct 2014 #41
Details Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #43
If Democrats in PA turn out to vote. This state has turned stupid, electing so many teabaggers. AlinPA Oct 2014 #44
Not this time though Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #49
This law is one paragraph in a law otherwise directed at metal thieves.. happyslug Oct 2014 #14
Weasel fuckers Sugarcoated Oct 2014 #16
Does Pennsylvania have a state pre-emption law? GGJohn Oct 2014 #18
Appears this will make church/state actions easier Paulie Oct 2014 #23
Democracy doe's not exist on the federal and state level , how dare local communities geretogo Oct 2014 #28
Are you really advocating that localities should be able to violate state law, branford Oct 2014 #29
I am willing to live by Majority rule with in the boundaries of the Constitution not by minority rule geretogo Oct 2014 #30
Even when the majority is actually conservative? branford Oct 2014 #32
Well done, Pennsylvania legislators. Aristus Oct 2014 #31
Do you have any evidence that the majority of PA citizens do not support the law? branford Oct 2014 #33
Okay. You're new here, so I'll let that slide. Aristus Oct 2014 #34
You left half of it out, GGJohn Oct 2014 #35
I did that deliberately in order to highlight the fact that pro-gunners always Aristus Oct 2014 #36
That's not the constitutional interpretation established by the Supreme Court, branford Oct 2014 #38
Please don't ask me to respect the judical acumen of the Felonius Five. Aristus Oct 2014 #39
Respectfully, did you read my post? branford Oct 2014 #40
Let the gun carnage continue. Brigid Oct 2014 #37
What does the NRA have against lost or stolen guns being reported? logosoco Oct 2014 #45
Do feel the same way if localities want more permissive and liberal gun regulations than state law? branford Oct 2014 #47
This is special treatment of gun owners. alarimer Oct 2014 #53
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»PA OKs Measure Allowing N...»Reply #17