Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Phila. 4-year-old shoots himself [View all]primavera
(5,191 posts)... when "historical interpretation" allows one to transmogrify the meaning of something that doesn't say what you want it to say into something that suddenly means exactly what you want it to say. Personally, it's my conviction that the Second Amendment actually refers to Tahitian mimes who wear pink polkadot tutus. Trust me, in 18th century speak, it makes perfect sense.
The point is, your personal interpretation is just that - personal interpretation, nothing more. True, the Fascist Five on the Court similarly believe that the drafters of the Constitution were smoking crack when they put in that whole well regulated militia bit and really didn't mean it as anything but a lark, but then, they're also the same raving psychotics who concluded that there was no actual need to count votes in Bush v. Gore and who held that elections should be purchasable by the wealthy in Citizens United. You can judge for yourself how sound their reasoning is.