Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Phoenix mom misses deadline for kids' trust fund [View all]rocktivity
(45,006 posts)14. UPDATE: The Deal Is Off, The Trial Is On
Last edited Tue Oct 28, 2014, 01:40 AM - Edit history (1)
Phoenix New Times.com: Jerry Cobb, Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery's spokesman, sent us this statement: "Due to the defendant's failure to comply with the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, the State has moved to reinstate prosecution."
...Taylor got her kids back from the state, bought new furniture and allowed the kids' baby daddy to move in, a guy who Taylor told the New York Times had not contributed regularly over the years to the financial needs of the children...
Taylor was supposed to put $10,000 for each child in an education trust. Prosecutors later negotiated to have Taylor put another $30,000 in a separate trust fund to help with childcare expenses. But on October 13, state prosecutors filed a motion in county Superior Court expressing concern that Taylor no longer had $60,000 of the donated money to fund the trusts...
...(T)hat still leaves the question of what she did with the contributions. While Taylor hasn't landed a job since her arrest and has been living off the donated money, if she indeed no longer has at least $60,000, that means she may have spent more than $54,000 in a little over six months. Maybe she used the money to pay off a reported $30,000 in outstanding student loans...
...Taylor got her kids back from the state, bought new furniture and allowed the kids' baby daddy to move in, a guy who Taylor told the New York Times had not contributed regularly over the years to the financial needs of the children...
Taylor was supposed to put $10,000 for each child in an education trust. Prosecutors later negotiated to have Taylor put another $30,000 in a separate trust fund to help with childcare expenses. But on October 13, state prosecutors filed a motion in county Superior Court expressing concern that Taylor no longer had $60,000 of the donated money to fund the trusts...
...(T)hat still leaves the question of what she did with the contributions. While Taylor hasn't landed a job since her arrest and has been living off the donated money, if she indeed no longer has at least $60,000, that means she may have spent more than $54,000 in a little over six months. Maybe she used the money to pay off a reported $30,000 in outstanding student loans...
Why didn't the court have her sign the money over to them when they negotiated the deal? They could easily have helped her with working out a payment plan for the student loans, getting child support from the baby daddy, AND working out a budget she could live on. And I guess her story about the money being in her mother's account turned out not to be true. Unfortunately, making the wrong choice seems to be her specialty.
rocktivity
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
To be fair, I've seen much worse parents than this who just keep popping them out...
Blue_Tires
Nov 2014
#99
Wow. She's not willing to put $60,000 out of the $114,000 that was donated to her,
Nye Bevan
Oct 2014
#9
I can't really disagree with you. This may have been her only source of income the past 6 months.
nomorenomore08
Oct 2014
#15
No, I think she should have done as she promised the DA and put part of the money into the trust for
LisaL
Nov 2014
#88
You probably should have directed that at the person who started the thread.
Dr. Strange
Nov 2014
#96
Setting aside the money in a trust fund for the kids was part of the settlement she agreed to
cstanleytech
Oct 2014
#21
She might also have some tax troubles as I do believe that money is considered
mackerel
Oct 2014
#16
Left kids in car, got $114,000 in donations, mom has the money meant for the kids?
NYC_SKP
Oct 2014
#24
I suspect gambling, that is how most such large sums of money is lost so quickly.
happyslug
Oct 2014
#56