Trayvon Martin Death Won't Go To Fla. Grand Jury

[thessolonian]

55. Humble Opinion

First I would like to note that I am a constitutional conservative. I read and listen to “left” or “liberal” media sources often. As we journey down the path to knowledge it is imperative that we do not limit ourselves to only those who are likeminded. As I listen to, for lack of better words, opposing views it allows me to gain a better perspective on various issues. Doing this allows me to either solidify or alter my opinions, both subjective and objective, on many topics.

The core issue at hand is the Florida prosecutor’s decision to not utilize a grand jury. The article provides us a valid summary on why the prosecutor decided so. I would like to add that a finding an unbiased (either way) grand jury after the flurry of media coverage would be next to impossible. This could also be an additional reason. But let us assume he could get a fair and unbiased grand jury.

The burden of proof is placed on the state. Florida law provides (to the best of my knowledge) an individual an affirmative defense to prosecution for self-defense. This can also be applied in grand jury cases. If the prosecutor cannot refute a defense council’s claim of affirmative defense for their client, (a claim that is presumed on and supported by state law) based on evidence that is provided, the there is a likelihood that a grand jury would no-bill Zimmerman. If that was indeed the case, we can see why a prosecutor would prefer not to use a grand jury (see double jeopardy).

Trayvon Martin, as anytime human life is needlessly lost, is a tragedy. However, let us all remember, Zimmerman is innocent until proven guilty. If in fact he is found guilty, then by all means he should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. However, until his guilt or innocence is decided (in accordance with the rule of law) let us remain as objective as possible.