Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,790 posts)
37. Yeah, I pointed this out yesterday.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 02:43 PM
Nov 2014

It got two recs and no responses, but it is good to have them admit to it in their own words.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025766855

This is an important part of what is going in:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025773462

How Much Difference Did New Voting Restrictions Make in Yesterday’s Close Races? Apparently A LOT.

Separate article:

http://billmoyers.com/2014/11/05/corporate-triumphs-progressive-victories-roadmap-democratic-revival

Corporate Triumphs, Progressive Victories and the Roadmap for a Democratic Revival
November 5, 2014
by Peter Dreier

Tuesday’s Republican wave of election victories did not reflect public opinion or the public mood. Instead it was the result of the GOP’s triumph in changing the rules of democracy to favor big business and conservative interest groups, including the triumphs of corporate money and voter suppression. But while Democrat candidates were going down to defeat, liberals and progressive won some impressive but little-publicized victories on important issues — including minimum wage hikes — especially in red and purple states, suggesting that voters are not as conservative as the pundits are pontificating. One of the most significant victories occurred in Richmond, California, where progressives defeated a slate funded by Chevron, the nation’s third largest corporation, which poured at least $3 million (about $150 for each likely voter) into this municipal election in this working class Bay Area city of 105,000 people.

- snip -

Plutocratic Political Gains

These progressive victories are impressive, but they don’t offset the huge GOP triumphs around the country. Democrats knew they had an uphill fight. Among the 36 Senate races, 21 were seats held by Democrats, including six in states that Mitt Romney won in 2012. Five factors, in particular, contributed to Tuesday’s GOP gains. It was a victory for plutocracy and profit over democracy, a triumph for the super-rich and Republicans who changed the rules to favor their own interests.

Big Money. Donors spent more than $4 billion in this midterm election. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, this was the most expensive midterm election in American history. This was a triumph for the Supreme Court’s Citizens United and McCutcheon rulings that permitted unlimited money to buy elections. The biggest donors, billionaires like the Koch brothers and Sheldon Adelson, poured “dark money” — hidden from public scrutiny by arcane campaign finance laws — into key races that certainly helped elect Republicans. Karl Rove’s Crossroads organizations and the US Chamber of Commerce spent hundreds of millions of dollars to help elect conservative Republicans in the House, Senate and governors races. We may never know the full extent of the billionaires’ bankroll, especially in key battleground Senate races where they targeted much of their war chest. The Republicans increase in Senate seats – from 45 to at least 52 – depended on outspending Democrats by a wide margin in those key races in where Republicans captured seats held by Democrats in Colorado, Arkansas, Iowa, Montana, North Carolina, South Dakota, and West Virginia. Three incumbent Democratic senators – Senators Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Mark Pryor of Arkansas, and Mark Udall of Colorado – lost their seats.

As the Center for Responsive Politics reported a week before the election, “outside groups, which are overwhelmingly fueled by large donors, are picking up more of the tab” of election costs, increasingly by funding issue ads and funneling money to shadowy so-called “social welfare” organizations that can hide their donations but focus most of their money to help Republican candidates.

Voter Suppression and Low Turnout among Democratic-leaning voters. Midterm elections always see much lower turnout than in presidential years. On Tuesday, less than 40 percent of American voters went to the polls, and the ones who voted hardly reflected the American people. The midterm electorate was much whiter, wealthier and more elderly than the voters in 2012 or even those in the last midterm election four years ago. As Bloomberg News reported, “Those 65 and older represented a quarter of the national electorate, up from 21 percent four years earlier.” This demographic debacle was compounded by Republican efforts to suppress the vote of African-Americans, Latinos, young people and the poor. These groups voted in significantly smaller numbers this year than they did two years ago. This was the first election since the Supreme Court eviscerated the Voting Rights Act and many states – particularly those with a large number of eligible African-American voters — adopted laws making it more difficult to vote, aimed at reducing turnout by these Democratic constituencies.

Gerrymandering. After the 2010 Census, Republicans succeeded in redrawing House districts to favor their party, creating increasingly “safe” districts for GOP candidates. The GOP’s control of the majority of state legislatures and governors’s offices gave them an advantage that made it possible to redraw the districts to their liking. In 2012, Democrats won 1.3 million more votes than Republican in all 435 House race – 59.6 million and 58.2 million. In other words, Democrats won 55 percent of the two-party vote but GOP candidates won 54 percent of the 435 House seats. In Pennsylvania, for example, Democrats won 83,000 more votes than Republicans, but Republicans won 13 seats and Democrats won 5 seats. On Tuesday, the Pennsylvania Republicans increased their margin to 14 seats. Nationwide, the GOP widened their congressional majority to by at least another 8 seats to 243. This was more a reflection of partisan mapmaking than voter preferences.

MORE

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"we can't run on the merit of our ideas, so had to rig the game" NRaleighLiberal Nov 2014 #1
EXACTLY. n/t Triana Nov 2014 #8
"leveled the playing field" What planet is he from? L0oniX Nov 2014 #2
Since facts have a well-known liberal bias, they needed money to countract reality (nt) muriel_volestrangler Nov 2014 #20
Yes, they leveled the playing field. Gary 50 Nov 2014 #26
for over 40 years now, Republicans and even independents and liberals NewJeffCT Nov 2014 #32
Robert D. Novak was the one that said there was a liberal media. Major Hogwash Nov 2014 #68
Level as to raze it Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2014 #49
planet money ** ensemble Nov 2014 #52
Why did Brown lose the Governor election in Maryland? MTaylor Nov 2014 #62
Cecil County Maryland and the Eastern Shore turbinetree Nov 2014 #71
Our Democrat party destroyed the unions MTaylor Nov 2014 #72
"Our democrat party" TBF Nov 2014 #73
Bossie calls this a level playing field? They have all the money and now they own Congress and he jwirr Nov 2014 #3
of course NewJeffCT Nov 2014 #33
LOL jwirr Nov 2014 #34
Corruption turbinetree Nov 2014 #4
$3.6B is what's currently reported and is a conservative amount ... aggiesal Nov 2014 #11
WE can Win turbinetree Nov 2014 #36
Money is a corrupting factor. Baitball Blogger Nov 2014 #5
The SCOTUS gutted the 1st Amendment by their Citizens United ruling. Elmer S. E. Dump Nov 2014 #6
This election and many more elections to follow ... Auggie Nov 2014 #7
Before Citizens United, it was illegal ... aggiesal Nov 2014 #9
In a way, it almost doesn't matter if foreigns buy elections. The PTB are nationless anyway. valerief Nov 2014 #19
Why have Democrats not attacked on that issue? NewJeffCT Nov 2014 #35
Because they're doing it too. BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #43
It's tag-team wrestling. CJCRANE Nov 2014 #45
Pretty much BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #47
+1. candelista Nov 2014 #64
Actually, Mark Pryor had a commercial like that Art_from_Ark Nov 2014 #57
Except for people on DU and similar websites NewJeffCT Nov 2014 #58
Don't forget David Bossie was fired by Congresscritter Melonhead. Archae Nov 2014 #10
Citizens United certainly "leveled" something... FailureToCommunicate Nov 2014 #12
Yes, the elections have been stolen from the voters. sammy750 Nov 2014 #13
one more by product of Florida 2000 & bush v Gore Botany Nov 2014 #14
Yes, that was a turning point in a number of hugely important matters. I met a friend of Scalia Tues JudyM Nov 2014 #46
w/o bush v Gore we would never have had Botany Nov 2014 #53
Yup, could go on and on. It was a game changer, no question. I hope one day the 99% will rise. nt JudyM Nov 2014 #65
and w/out a doubt the Rove/bush/Cheney/ALEC/and so on left major players .... Botany Nov 2014 #66
Is it "level" or "leveled?" What a crock! mountain grammy Nov 2014 #15
I wonder atreides1 Nov 2014 #16
+10000000000 jillan Nov 2014 #22
People like Bossie are only happy when the game is rigged in their favor n/t deutsey Nov 2014 #17
If you need money to exercise "effective" free speech, it ain't free. nt valerief Nov 2014 #18
^^^THIS^^^ L0oniX Nov 2014 #21
That right there ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #44
because true victory is when a powerful few rule over the many with impunity. librechik Nov 2014 #23
as long as voter turnout is so pathetic, that's inevitable bhikkhu Nov 2014 #56
Vote all you want. librechik Nov 2014 #59
I think that's one position that leads to the wrong people in charge bhikkhu Nov 2014 #61
I truly don't think the parties are the same, at all; And I would never discourage voting. librechik Nov 2014 #63
Many states (including my own) have decent minimum wage laws bhikkhu Nov 2014 #67
I didn't see onethatcares Nov 2014 #24
Corporations are people my friend Iliyah Nov 2014 #27
but they onethatcares Nov 2014 #28
Can't wait for Texas to execute one Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2014 #50
How About SHAREHOLDERS UNITED?? bucolic_frolic Nov 2014 #25
Interesting point. KoKo Nov 2014 #39
Bingo, Mon Ami bucolic_frolic Nov 2014 #48
They depend on dark money underpants Nov 2014 #29
Looked like a headline lordsummerisle Nov 2014 #30
Bossie navarth Nov 2014 #31
Yeah, I pointed this out yesterday. Hissyspit Nov 2014 #37
Did you also post in "Good Reads?" "GD" is just a scroll through... KoKo Nov 2014 #40
And Good Reads is where good articles go to die of loneliness. Hissyspit Nov 2014 #41
6 years of letting families rot while propping up banks probably didn't help either. n/t jtuck004 Nov 2014 #38
Corporations are people, my friend. red dog 1 Nov 2014 #42
Citizens United will roll over us, this Nation, and anybody who's not right now part of the 1%. blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #51
I'm sure glad Harry Reid let Alito and Roberts on to the court without much fuss. The Stranger Nov 2014 #54
Leveled the field? blackspade Nov 2014 #55
Remember, SCOTUS decided for Bush in Bush v Gore because a recount "would have harmed Bush," librechik Nov 2014 #60
“gut the First Amendment” redruddyred Nov 2014 #69
University of Northern IA professor PatrynXX Nov 2014 #70
He is admitting that corporations bought the election for republicans. nt Zorra Nov 2014 #74
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Citizens United boss: Sup...»Reply #37