Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Reid: 'No desire' to obstruct GOP [View all] Freddie Stubbs Nov 2014 OP
Get rid of him upaloopa Nov 2014 #1
He is up for reelection in two years, but Freddie Stubbs Nov 2014 #3
I mean as minority leader. upaloopa Nov 2014 #12
The Democrats in the Senate seem to be happy with his leadership Freddie Stubbs Nov 2014 #13
That, indeed, is the bigger problem. Maedhros Nov 2014 #18
+1000 n/t MissDeeds Nov 2014 #19
No, it was Not President Obama. Cha Nov 2014 #66
Kind of interesting that when reThugs want to tie the place in knots they don't think about that! mazzarro Nov 2014 #48
The problem with your thesis is that Reid et al are not liberals. blackspade Nov 2014 #73
America has two senators -- Sanders and Warren. The rest are wind-up toys villager Nov 2014 #2
Actually, they are more like dummies and the corporations muntrv Nov 2014 #4
Well, that too. villager Nov 2014 #6
Exactly what I was afraid of. Phlem Nov 2014 #5
Only a shit head party would proclaim to be the party of "no". savalez Nov 2014 #7
The tactic of being the "Party of No" worked very, very well for the Republicans. Maedhros Nov 2014 #20
Block stuff you don't agree with savalez Nov 2014 #34
I don't expect the Republican majority will be bringing to the floor Maedhros Nov 2014 #35
Those should be blocked. n/t savalez Nov 2014 #36
Right on! Louisiana1976 Nov 2014 #58
History shows that they won't be blocked. blackspade Nov 2014 #74
I don't know about that statement. savalez Nov 2014 #99
If Turtle and the Drunk bring absurd bills Dawson Leery Nov 2014 #8
Or he could let the President veto them. Freddie Stubbs Nov 2014 #15
Then they'll have to stand up and talk for hours, unlike when Dems control the Senate. Scuba Nov 2014 #49
He is ok with different rules then get the red out Nov 2014 #9
GOP Sets Its Top Priority For 2016: Defeating Harry Reid a kennedy Nov 2014 #10
They made the same priority in 2010 and couldn't pull it off davidpdx Nov 2014 #83
"Democrats accused Republicans of using filibusters..." Enrique Nov 2014 #11
Good ol Give em head Harry! OffWithTheirHeads Nov 2014 #14
Roll Over and Bend Over bucolic_frolic Nov 2014 #16
Well said. Better yet, the Dems should resign and let the rethugs run things. Louisiana1976 Nov 2014 #60
Yes bucolic_frolic Nov 2014 #85
Doormat blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #17
One Party rule. Plain as anything. blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #21
How many times will the Democratic rank-and-file be duped by these charlatans Maedhros Nov 2014 #23
Why do we think they are duped? Caretha Nov 2014 #59
And it's Millenials' fault for not showing up at the polls. nt DRoseDARs Nov 2014 #22
Why would they show up? GeorgeGist Nov 2014 #28
Well, that's a little pissy, don't you think? Cutting off their noses to spite their faces? MADem Nov 2014 #40
Ah yes, the good ol' Draft Scootaloo Nov 2014 #56
I am not "endorsing" the concept. I do wish the children would study their frickin history, though. MADem Nov 2014 #71
People would be more inclined to vote if they see a marked difference between the two parties Xyzse Nov 2014 #84
Would that this were true. Lots of elections have tons of choice, and people still stay home. MADem Nov 2014 #93
Not quite but I do see your point. Xyzse Nov 2014 #95
No politicians ever came up to me and "explained why it was important." MADem Nov 2014 #101
Completely agreed that Civics should be taught once more in the class rooms. Xyzse Nov 2014 #102
I don't have any answers. I don't know how to motivate these kids. MADem Nov 2014 #104
We are all products of our environments sadly. Xyzse Nov 2014 #105
Well, I've been hollered at for saying that OWS was a good idea, executed poorly. MADem Nov 2014 #108
Actually, I completely agree with you in that post. Xyzse Nov 2014 #111
They both suck Reter Nov 2014 #92
I don't see the problem with this. maxrandb Nov 2014 #24
Unfortunately, you are correct. BlueCaliDem Nov 2014 #27
SCHUUUUUUU-mer! Old Nick Nov 2014 #25
PuhleeZ , , , markpkessinger Nov 2014 #78
well that's not helpful azurnoir Nov 2014 #26
Again The Rethugs Put The Dems In This No Win Position.... global1 Nov 2014 #29
Great--whats next turbinetree Nov 2014 #30
You have misunderstood the Social Security taxes. If you make $17,000.01, you pay SS tax on $17,000 24601 Nov 2014 #61
no surprise - our democratic leaders are wimps and that's why samsingh Nov 2014 #31
lol RandiFan1290 Nov 2014 #32
Reid should have been throw out long ago DonCoquixote Nov 2014 #33
obstruction tuhaybey Nov 2014 #37
SMART MAN. MADem Nov 2014 #38
Agree. lamp_shade Nov 2014 #42
that's assuming Obama will use that veto pen yurbud Nov 2014 #96
You are correct sir. 4dsc Nov 2014 #97
It's kind of like being a paramedic, rushing a dying person to the hospital, only to be told yurbud Nov 2014 #98
Sometimes being a lame duck is a powerful position. MADem Nov 2014 #100
it didn't seem to play out that way with Bubba. yurbud Nov 2014 #106
Barack isn't Bubba.They don't have the same forces driving them, they're from different generations. MADem Nov 2014 #107
and yet Obama seemed to be trying to do triangulation--the GOP just refused to take yes f yurbud Nov 2014 #109
Triangulation is telling the GOP to go fuck themselves on immigration, keystone, and global warming? MADem Nov 2014 #110
DNC needs to scrape the angrychair Nov 2014 #39
You don't get how it works. That's obvious from your comments. MADem Nov 2014 #43
that is where you angrychair Nov 2014 #77
No. You do not get it. MADem Nov 2014 #81
I disagree with most of you. lamp_shade Nov 2014 #41
We have the catbird seat--and the guy in the catbird seat has a veto pen. MADem Nov 2014 #44
Harry knows how the game is played. lamp_shade Nov 2014 #46
Couldn't agree more--he knows the rules backwards and forwards! MADem Nov 2014 #47
Some here aren't bright enough to understand your point. JoePhilly Nov 2014 #86
^^ Clearly. lamp_shade Nov 2014 #88
that's why you got trashed Skittles Nov 2014 #45
congress approval was at 11% but 94% got riversedge Nov 2014 #50
Way to wave the white Flag dbackjon Nov 2014 #51
Of course you wouldn't...spineless jellyfish. SoapBox Nov 2014 #52
I think we win in 2016 if we stand aside now oldandhappy Nov 2014 #53
Yes, that 12-D chess/give them plenty of rope worked really well heading into 2010 Doctor_J Nov 2014 #65
yea, ok oldandhappy Nov 2014 #70
Not for nothing Cosmocat Nov 2014 #89
Ugh (nt) malokvale77 Nov 2014 #54
No Balls Harry should quit! santamargarita Nov 2014 #55
I'd love for this to just be the PR face toddwv Nov 2014 #57
Exhibit B on why the party is no longer a viable entity Doctor_J Nov 2014 #62
Touche Carolina Nov 2014 #64
See, now that is just bullshit Cosmocat Nov 2014 #91
No need to Turbineguy Nov 2014 #63
Republicans do NOT know how to govern AC_Mem Nov 2014 #67
Reid Third Doctor Nov 2014 #68
Obstruct the GOP? Brigid Nov 2014 #69
Holy Fuck. blackspade Nov 2014 #72
Why Does our side always capitulate?? Stargleamer Nov 2014 #75
Because we're "pragmatists," don't you know! markpkessinger Nov 2014 #79
YEP Cosmocat Nov 2014 #90
And that's the fucking problem! Prophet 451 Nov 2014 #76
That's fine as an initial public statement Blue Idaho Nov 2014 #80
You spineless POS. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #82
Does the GOP admit to obstructing Obama? JoePhilly Nov 2014 #87
with a GOP majority, it can function, but not for the American people yurbud Nov 2014 #94
I am going the other way on this one. GitRDun Nov 2014 #103
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Reid: 'No desire' to obst...»Reply #94