Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Gun sales surge ahead of jury's Ferguson decision [View all]turbinetree
(26,866 posts)Normally during a grand jury investigation, we do not have a police chief, prosecutor, and Governor eliciting ANY information about what is going on, but apparently these three have decided upon themselves to prepare for Armageddon, what a comforting thought. They have been stock piling weapons mind you to used in what fashion, and its not a good thought, this is just like a police state, using the media to stoke this inflammation, and have leaked information through the media to further justify this act.
My question to everyone in that particular state how does it really feel to live there, how does it really feel to live in a state fear.
If this officer had been thrown in jail and been given due process, it would be a different outcome, but that has not been the case, it appears to be the use of intimidation, that is really sad.
Then to have a gun shop owner eliciting that the police and whoever is not able to protect everyone further inflames the situation, I really have to ask this question should he the gun dealer be held liable and should this gun dealer be held responsible he has a responsibility for selling that gun to someone, is he not liable in the transaction for the aftermath, I mean really.
Its like going into a Radio shack on property owned by someone or private entity and an individual walks in packing heat, and if, and this is a big if, something should happen is Radio Shack responsible for renting the building, or is the property owner responsible, I say the property owner, they should have sign posted on there property that says no guns are allowed on the property, even if you have the right to carry a gun, who is liable and responsible that is the question.
I know I am going to get the good old second amendment crowd but you know what read the amendment one more time from front to back, its really simple