Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
2. Attitudes like that are not helpful.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 10:06 PM
Nov 2014

Hatred of taxes is a constitutionally protected political belief under the First Amendment.

If there were a proven connection between "hatred of taxes," a belief shared by the overwhelming majority of Americans, liberal and conservative, and actual violations of the tax and criminal code, would you kindly provide evidence of indictments, prosecutions or even settlement between the IRS and any Tea Party groups, of course other than those lawsuits by the Tea Party groups against the IRS. In fact, it is my understanding that the application for the relevant tax status has been approved for all the groups or are still pending and subject to lawsuits against the IRS.

Simply, the IRS must always remain totally apolitical. One you excuse unlawful actions against your political adversaries, it will most assuredly be used against you and your allies when the government inevitably switches parties.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

why WOULDN'T they give extra scrutiny to teabagging assholes? Skittles Nov 2014 #1
Attitudes like that are not helpful. branford Nov 2014 #2
Well said ripcord Nov 2014 #3
Hatred of taxes IS a constitutionally-protected political belief... jmowreader Nov 2014 #5
The Tea Party groups were engaged in activities that fell under the relevant tax code provisions, branford Nov 2014 #8
a quality post Psephos Nov 2014 #19
Here's the basic deal, when the Teabaggers started getting all pissed off, Darb Nov 2014 #10
No. branford Nov 2014 #12
Speaking as a civil servant - because we check ideology at the door. You enforce the rule of law 24601 Nov 2014 #6
they're claiming non-profit status while pimping for candidates Skittles Nov 2014 #7
You can blame the tax code regulations that actually permit limited campaigning branford Nov 2014 #9
Someone has apparently misled you regarding the distinctions between 501c(3) and 501c(4) 24601 Nov 2014 #11
and how many were denied the requested status due to the so-called extra scrutiny Skittles Nov 2014 #13
Not only irrelevant, it supports the fact that the extra scrutiny was entirely undeserved. branford Nov 2014 #14
How convienent. On the day they finally admit Bengahzi is bullshit, hope for the teabaggers... Thor_MN Nov 2014 #4
Eggs-actly what I thought: HOW CONVENIENT! DemoTex Nov 2014 #16
I like the analogy!! Thor_MN Nov 2014 #17
investigation into inappropriate treatment by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Bandit Nov 2014 #15
ISSA was fired from the oversight committe because of his many LIES. His only mission was targeted sammy750 Nov 2014 #18
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Some Missing Lois Lerner ...»Reply #2