Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
8. The Tea Party groups were engaged in activities that fell under the relevant tax code provisions,
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 12:08 AM
Nov 2014

or they all would not have been approved. Whether you or others disagree with the tax code or the Tea Party groups is entirely irrelevant. If you want to change the tax code, lobby Congress.

The government cannot engage in extra scrutiny of groups, no less withhold approval, because certain civil servants do not agree with the the groups' ideology or politics. That is a clear violation of the groups' First Amendment Rights and related federal law. The IRS must always remain apolitical. This simple and undeniable truth was confirmed because of criminals like Nixon.

If it's acceptable to target and harass conservative groups, when Republicans are in power, expect identical if not worse treatment of liberal groups and individuals.

Simply, directly in response to your comment, some groups with certain constitutionally protected beliefs or activities are in fact tax exempt. Civil servants cannot treat these groups differently because they do not agree with such beliefs. The law is clear and undeniable.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

why WOULDN'T they give extra scrutiny to teabagging assholes? Skittles Nov 2014 #1
Attitudes like that are not helpful. branford Nov 2014 #2
Well said ripcord Nov 2014 #3
Hatred of taxes IS a constitutionally-protected political belief... jmowreader Nov 2014 #5
The Tea Party groups were engaged in activities that fell under the relevant tax code provisions, branford Nov 2014 #8
a quality post Psephos Nov 2014 #19
Here's the basic deal, when the Teabaggers started getting all pissed off, Darb Nov 2014 #10
No. branford Nov 2014 #12
Speaking as a civil servant - because we check ideology at the door. You enforce the rule of law 24601 Nov 2014 #6
they're claiming non-profit status while pimping for candidates Skittles Nov 2014 #7
You can blame the tax code regulations that actually permit limited campaigning branford Nov 2014 #9
Someone has apparently misled you regarding the distinctions between 501c(3) and 501c(4) 24601 Nov 2014 #11
and how many were denied the requested status due to the so-called extra scrutiny Skittles Nov 2014 #13
Not only irrelevant, it supports the fact that the extra scrutiny was entirely undeserved. branford Nov 2014 #14
How convienent. On the day they finally admit Bengahzi is bullshit, hope for the teabaggers... Thor_MN Nov 2014 #4
Eggs-actly what I thought: HOW CONVENIENT! DemoTex Nov 2014 #16
I like the analogy!! Thor_MN Nov 2014 #17
investigation into inappropriate treatment by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Bandit Nov 2014 #15
ISSA was fired from the oversight committe because of his many LIES. His only mission was targeted sammy750 Nov 2014 #18
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Some Missing Lois Lerner ...»Reply #8