Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
15. I imagine the timing could easily be manipulated.
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 08:09 PM
Nov 2014

The district attorney would simply need to call another minor and generally irrelevant witness, or even heartily "encourage" the grand jury to just "take their time" "in the interests of justice." All perfectly legal and would not affect whether an indictment issues.

The grand jurors are also not fools and probably are well aware of the political problems that could result from their decision, even if they are fully complying with all grand jury rules and procedures and are completely fair and honest. I even read an article recently about how additional measures are now being taken to ensure the anonymity and protection of the jurors. This could also explain and justify any delays.

Lastly, note that the grand jury does not meet every day or necessarily hear testimony or deliberate for entire days.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes, I agree. no text... Stuart G Nov 2014 #1
I updated my post. There is some text, but nothing really new. n/t amandabeech Nov 2014 #2
All pretense that they're "deliberating." That cop's gonna walk. That's my guess. blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #3
I also am hopeful this is a good sign. If it was an easy "no," it would have happened already. n/t pnwmom Nov 2014 #4
I don't know what the Grand Jury is doing Jack Rabbit Nov 2014 #5
I think its a good thing too. elleng Nov 2014 #6
My guess is that they want to wait until right before Thanksgiving before releasing the news. branford Nov 2014 #7
That's certainly a possibity, particularly if it's "no bill." amandabeech Nov 2014 #9
That's certainly possible. I have no idea the full extent of the evidence and testimony. branford Nov 2014 #11
I recall reading that Missouri has voluntary and involuntary manslaughter available. amandabeech Nov 2014 #12
I would think though they have to release the decision within a certain amount of time davidpdx Nov 2014 #14
I imagine the timing could easily be manipulated. branford Nov 2014 #15
Good points davidpdx Nov 2014 #16
McCulloch stated he expected a decision in November. branford Nov 2014 #17
They don't want to release the news on a weekend KeepItReal Nov 2014 #8
waiting for some bad weather? ...nt quadrature Nov 2014 #10
St. Louis weather this weekend is rain and high in the '50s. amandabeech Nov 2014 #13
sounds like no decision announcement until Wednesday at the earliest then rollin74 Nov 2014 #18
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ferguson grand jury won't...»Reply #15