Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No indictment in Ferguson case [View all] blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 OP
based on McCulloch's statements of facts right now (I'm watching KSDK stream) alp227 Nov 2014 #1
Jesus wept. :( Starry Messenger Nov 2014 #2
My thoughts,too! n/t Duval Nov 2014 #81
Rodney King riots 2.0 start in 3-2-1... Archae Nov 2014 #3
I hope not. 840high Nov 2014 #5
Same here. Archae Nov 2014 #13
History teaches us that we learn nothing from history derby378 Nov 2014 #34
and utterly provoked PatrynXX Nov 2014 #64
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #108
I doubt anyone here in MO was surprised. Indict a police officer? Ha bjobotts Nov 2014 #72
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #114
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #106
Oh, stop your Brainy Smurfing derby378 Nov 2014 #113
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #115
There was nothing but anger on the faces of people interviewed leading up to the announcement Miles Archer Nov 2014 #8
my first thought too ... yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #21
I doubt it.... Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2014 #69
i doubt it. Ferguson PD is locked and loaded and ready to fire Heather MC Nov 2014 #86
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #103
No way Reter Nov 2014 #150
The prosecutor giving the long winded statement on CNN LiberalElite Nov 2014 #4
You can tell how mad he is pothos Nov 2014 #14
When the DA walked out, I felt that the DA ... aggiesal Nov 2014 #6
let them celebrate heaven05 Nov 2014 #40
damn uppityperson Nov 2014 #7
Its sad when one could see this coming. Third Doctor Nov 2014 #9
Seems CNN's previous tweet was correct then: Triana Nov 2014 #10
I told you Robbins Nov 2014 #11
Absolute bullshit damnedifIknow Nov 2014 #12
jesus fucking christ... dhill926 Nov 2014 #15
His Mocking Tone Is Troubling otohara Nov 2014 #16
He blamed everyone BUT Darren Wilson. And he did it with a smirk on his face. - nt KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #137
the machine wins again belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #17
The prosecutor was the defense attorney in this case. kelliekat44 Nov 2014 #18
Welcome to the Police States of America RoccoR5955 Nov 2014 #19
Unreal ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2014 #20
None of those witnesses who testified before the Grand Jury were cross-examined aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2014 #22
I was wondering the same thing Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #131
I chose to wait Iamthetruth Nov 2014 #23
I am sure heaven05 Nov 2014 #32
I saw a headline here on DU the DA won't release the evidence put forward n/t tom_kelly Nov 2014 #33
You'll be waiting a long time then. blackspade Nov 2014 #61
Maybe I heard it wrong Iamthetruth Nov 2014 #82
he did say that. all evidence will be released n/t orleans Nov 2014 #93
that would be a surprising development. blackspade Nov 2014 #123
you deserve a cookie noiretextatique Nov 2014 #148
Send me my damn cookie Iamthetruth Nov 2014 #157
Civil lawsuit? elias7 Nov 2014 #24
Sure. Also, federal prosecution is an option. (nt) jeff47 Nov 2014 #50
Impaneling another grand jury is also an option, truebluegreen Nov 2014 #89
The same DA would have to do it. jeff47 Nov 2014 #92
That's too bad. truebluegreen Nov 2014 #98
Again, MO law doesn't allow the Governor to do anything without the DA. jeff47 Nov 2014 #100
I get that. truebluegreen Nov 2014 #104
Early on he pressured the DA to step aside. The DA refused jeff47 Nov 2014 #124
Then maybe I'm being unfair to him. truebluegreen Nov 2014 #146
federal investigation in ongoing. eom noiretextatique Nov 2014 #147
did anyone really think there would be an indictment? Marrah_G Nov 2014 #25
no heaven05 Nov 2014 #31
Nope.... BronxBoy Nov 2014 #41
No Mugu Nov 2014 #46
there isn't enough alcohol in the world to makes us all that stupid! niyad Nov 2014 #53
no ALBliberal Nov 2014 #58
no ALBliberal Nov 2014 #59
No. GoneFishin Nov 2014 #75
I hoped there would be. Then I learned that the GJ was not sequestered. Then I read KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #138
hell no, but noiretextatique Nov 2014 #149
Unf*cking real. Gemini Cat Nov 2014 #26
We don't have a Grand Jury system in Australia, Matilda Nov 2014 #27
A grand jury decides whether or not to indict. drm604 Nov 2014 #36
What are the circumstances Matilda Nov 2014 #38
That I don't know. drm604 Nov 2014 #42
The DA. He could have just sent it to regular trial. harun Nov 2014 #43
No, that shitstain McCulloch could have put it before a 'preliminary hearing' to KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #139
More-or-less up to the prosecutor. jeff47 Nov 2014 #45
Wikipedia has an entry. drm604 Nov 2014 #51
There are essentially two ways to charge a defendant. ColesCountyDem Nov 2014 #70
Also GJ's can (rarely) "go rogue" Recursion Nov 2014 #79
True on both counts, no pun intended. n/t ColesCountyDem Nov 2014 #83
Generally the DA presents evidence (it's not a "trial" per se) Recursion Nov 2014 #76
Thanks to everybody for their help. Matilda Nov 2014 #105
In most state systems it is prosecutorial discression. CanonRay Nov 2014 #77
here's what i think is kind of weird/odd orleans Nov 2014 #99
Grand Juries date back to a time before public prosecutors Recursion Nov 2014 #116
I think you need nine Yupster Nov 2014 #128
No, it takes four votes not to indict. former9thward Nov 2014 #130
I think you actually do, but it's (almost) never used Recursion Nov 2014 #73
It varies a little bit from state to state Travelman Nov 2014 #96
Welcome to the new old South Africa CANDO Nov 2014 #28
Wonder when, or if, we shall see the emergence of a new ANC and a new KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #140
The system is broken CANDO Nov 2014 #159
I won't advocate that anyone take up armed struggle, since I am unable to do so myself, but KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #160
No indictment!!!!????!! TinkerTot55 Nov 2014 #29
At any time. (nt) jeff47 Nov 2014 #47
Federal Jurisdiction runs currently with the State's and the Federal Government can act pretty much 24601 Nov 2014 #67
no surprise heaven05 Nov 2014 #30
I wish I could say I'm shocked but I'm not azurnoir Nov 2014 #35
Sickened. historylovr Nov 2014 #37
And so the streak continues unabated....... BronxBoy Nov 2014 #39
Booooo m-lekktor Nov 2014 #44
Injustice LibbyTreehugger Nov 2014 #48
Hopefully the Protests Stay Peaceful erpowers Nov 2014 #49
so you consider the failure of the so-called "justice system" not a good reason to be upset? niyad Nov 2014 #55
Did Not Say That erpowers Nov 2014 #101
ok, thanks. niyad Nov 2014 #102
As long as black people stay inside their homes and don't venture out as KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #141
I'm guessing the prosecutor made it clear he didn't want to indict this cop. alarimer Nov 2014 #52
I am guessing exactly the same, particularly considering lovemydog Nov 2014 #80
He probably smirked or 'winked' at the GJ as he made his KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #142
Does anyone have any of the livestream.... ReRe Nov 2014 #54
What a shocking development.... blackspade Nov 2014 #56
A real non-surprise nikto Nov 2014 #57
Gunshots on one livestream, great =( JesterCS Nov 2014 #60
This is just a continuation of what is going on in the country kansasobama Nov 2014 #62
blaming liberals for this? Doctor_J Nov 2014 #162
I am profoundly ashamed to be an American today. MrModerate Nov 2014 #63
Please Iamthetruth Nov 2014 #90
So an indictment = revenge? On what planet? nt truebluegreen Nov 2014 #94
planet white noiretextatique Nov 2014 #151
A trial would have been public . . . MrModerate Nov 2014 #117
I've been doing the Canadian bit for years... truebluegreen Nov 2014 #109
And that fact hasn't been lost on America's friends. n/t MrModerate Nov 2014 #118
what is required to indict? Lucky Luciano Nov 2014 #65
It sounded like Michael Brown was on trial, not the cop. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2014 #68
Everyone (victim, witnesses and media) was on trial BUT the cop. Ab-so-friggin'-lutely KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #143
Oh shit!! Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2014 #158
If only Michael Brown had been a Wall Street Banker... nikto Nov 2014 #66
do not discount race noiretextatique Nov 2014 #153
I hope they release all of the evidence lovemydog Nov 2014 #71
At what point can an unarmed person be shot? confoosed Nov 2014 #78
Legally, after a reasonable person would feel fear for his or someone else's life Recursion Nov 2014 #84
I think the evidence from inside the car will be interesting confoosed Nov 2014 #87
If we get to see it (nt) Recursion Nov 2014 #88
State laws vary in regard to when a police officer may shoot an unarmed person. lovemydog Nov 2014 #91
My two friends who do ConLaw have opined that Missouri's law is impermissably broad Recursion Nov 2014 #111
Yes, that's what I figured. lovemydog Nov 2014 #119
A white police officer will not face charges for fatally shooting an unarmed black teenager workinclasszero Nov 2014 #74
Shameful . . . markpkessinger Nov 2014 #85
Bet it was a 9-3 vote down racial lines. Ash_F Nov 2014 #95
What a shameful Grand Jury decision, King_David Nov 2014 #97
Police car on fire. Bullets are exploiding from inside the burning car. C Moon Nov 2014 #107
the description that was read in the half hour statement orleans Nov 2014 #110
So Wilson was scared enough to fire two shots from his vehicle pasto76 Nov 2014 #112
You've summed it up well. nt SunSeeker Nov 2014 #129
his story makes sense noiretextatique Nov 2014 #152
This message was self-deleted by its author SunSeeker Nov 2014 #156
So, I imagine that the grand jury felt that Wilson could not receive a fair trial in court. world wide wally Nov 2014 #120
This is the 5 cop not indicted in Ferguson. sammy750 Nov 2014 #121
Unbelievable... Rhiannon12866 Nov 2014 #122
But the US is no longer a racist country! s/ Odin2005 Nov 2014 #125
burning joglee Nov 2014 #126
Thanks for your concern. - nt KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #144
It would be appropriate for the President humbled_opinion Nov 2014 #127
Why would you declare a state of emergency if the fix wasn't in? Stryder Nov 2014 #132
And people think I'm silly when I say ZombieHorde Nov 2014 #133
Not all people. (n/t) Nihil Nov 2014 #136
Marx would argue that 'law' and 'the legal system' are part of a society's KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #145
you are not silly noiretextatique Nov 2014 #154
Who do you fear more, the police or the people? SkatmanRoth Nov 2014 #134
I may be the only one here that didn't follow this story but what exactly happened? WhoWoodaKnew Nov 2014 #135
business as usual. eom noiretextatique Nov 2014 #155
Cop lost his temper. Murdered somebody. Ash_F Nov 2014 #161
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»No indictment in Ferguson...»Reply #21