Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Omaha Steve

(109,337 posts)
Sat Nov 29, 2014, 10:32 AM Nov 2014

EX-UPS driver's pregnancy bias claim at high court [View all]

Source: AP-EXCITE

By MARK SHERMAN

WASHINGTON (AP) — Peggy Young only has to look at her younger daughter to be reminded how long she has fought United Parcel Service over its treatment of pregnant employees, and why.

Young was pregnant with Triniti, who's now 7 years old, when UPS told Young that she could not have a temporary assignment to avoid lifting heavy packages, as her doctor had ordered.

"They told me basically to go home and come back when I was no longer pregnant," Young said in an interview with The Associated Press. "I couldn't believe it."

She sued the Atlanta-based package-delivery company for discriminating against pregnant women. She lost two rounds in lower courts, but the Supreme Court will hear her case Wednesday.

FULL story at link.



This Nov. 14, 2014, photo, shows Peggy Young, of Lorton, Va., with her daughter Triniti, 7, in Washington. Peggy Young has only to look at her 7-year-old younger daughter to be reminded how long she has been fighting with United Parcel Service over its treatment of pregnant employees, and why. Young was pregnant when the company told her she could not have a temporary assignment to avoid lifting heavy packages, as her doctor ordered. She sued UPS for discriminating against pregnant women and, after losing two rounds in lower courts, the Supreme Court will hear her case Wednesday. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20141129/us-supreme-court-pregnancy-discrimination-0aba799900.html

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is a tough one NV Whino Nov 2014 #1
non-sense, there are plenty of jobs at UPS that doesn't involve lifting heavy weight itsrobert Nov 2014 #2
Of occur se there are jobs like that NV Whino Nov 2014 #3
You may want to reread the article as it clearly states they have provided light duty cstanleytech Nov 2014 #4
Thanks. NV Whino Nov 2014 #5
I worked at UPS for 17 years, 12 in management mikekohr Nov 2014 #6
Ease up there Mike, I wasnt defending them for this. cstanleytech Nov 2014 #8
Actually I was, kinda. mikekohr Nov 2014 #10
Upon Further Review I ammend My Position mikekohr Dec 2014 #13
Being injured isn't a choice though Snow Leopard Dec 2014 #17
UPS has already began modifying their policy on pregnancy mikekohr Dec 2014 #18
She delivered envelopes and light parcels and only occasionally had packages tammywammy Dec 2014 #14
Another opportunity for the Scalia 5 Kelvin Mace Nov 2014 #7
Yeah, want to bet what the decision on this will be? Hugin Nov 2014 #11
I prefer the term "Fascist Five" it has a nice ring to it. nt okaawhatever Dec 2014 #15
True, Kelvin Mace Dec 2014 #16
The key words are "reasonable accommodation" and that it's intuitive that a company with the size 24601 Nov 2014 #9
With this "Corporations are people too" SCOTUS INdemo Nov 2014 #12
Perhaps this deserves another thread, but this is a great article on topic mikekohr Dec 2014 #19
When you consider that a pharmacist can refuse to give a customer crim son Dec 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»EX-UPS driver's pregnancy...