Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is a tough one NV Whino Nov 2014 #1
non-sense, there are plenty of jobs at UPS that doesn't involve lifting heavy weight itsrobert Nov 2014 #2
Of occur se there are jobs like that NV Whino Nov 2014 #3
You may want to reread the article as it clearly states they have provided light duty cstanleytech Nov 2014 #4
Thanks. NV Whino Nov 2014 #5
I worked at UPS for 17 years, 12 in management mikekohr Nov 2014 #6
Ease up there Mike, I wasnt defending them for this. cstanleytech Nov 2014 #8
Actually I was, kinda. mikekohr Nov 2014 #10
Upon Further Review I ammend My Position mikekohr Dec 2014 #13
Being injured isn't a choice though Snow Leopard Dec 2014 #17
UPS has already began modifying their policy on pregnancy mikekohr Dec 2014 #18
She delivered envelopes and light parcels and only occasionally had packages tammywammy Dec 2014 #14
Another opportunity for the Scalia 5 Kelvin Mace Nov 2014 #7
Yeah, want to bet what the decision on this will be? Hugin Nov 2014 #11
I prefer the term "Fascist Five" it has a nice ring to it. nt okaawhatever Dec 2014 #15
True, Kelvin Mace Dec 2014 #16
The key words are "reasonable accommodation" and that it's intuitive that a company with the size 24601 Nov 2014 #9
With this "Corporations are people too" SCOTUS INdemo Nov 2014 #12
Perhaps this deserves another thread, but this is a great article on topic mikekohr Dec 2014 #19
When you consider that a pharmacist can refuse to give a customer crim son Dec 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»EX-UPS driver's pregnancy...»Reply #17