Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

damyank913

(787 posts)

17. I agree, however...

Reply to Robbins (Reply #2)

Wed Dec 3, 2014, 02:50 PM

Dec 2014

... I also think that they're planning to take away many tax credits that appear in the 1040 tax forms. Especially on the schedule "A". This way they can say that they reworked the tax code and reduced entitlements while still "caring" for the neediest among us.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bipartisan bill to widen federal help for disabled [View all] Omaha Steve Dec 2014 OP

Well, this is a good bill TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2014 #1

That was my question. I worked as a social worker with this group and not one single one would get jwirr Dec 2014 #8

Problem Is Robbins Dec 2014 #2

I agree, however... damyank913 Dec 2014 #17

Most disabled people My Good Babushka Dec 2014 #3

Think of the Koch brothers with a cane. LiberalArkie Dec 2014 #4

Yep. But will be heralded as a great triumph for the least among us. nt raouldukelives Dec 2014 #12

Excellent point. Hugin Dec 2014 #5

Not true CreekDog Dec 2014 #14

I never said "all the disabled are poor" My Good Babushka Dec 2014 #15

And why shouldn't those disabled who need to save for health care expenses CreekDog Dec 2014 #16

I never said they shouldn't be able to My Good Babushka Dec 2014 #18

Bipartisian support is a good -and so rare- thing. The ADA would not have passed without FailureToCommunicate Dec 2014 #6

Austerity 2.0 turbinetree Dec 2014 #7

Yes, a lot of things that have happened are bad but this next congress puts the fear of the devil jwirr Dec 2014 #10

what.a.joke. angrychair Dec 2014 #9

What I am afraid they mean to do is use the money from some other program (Medicare) to put in jwirr Dec 2014 #11

My daughter would like the ability to marry and work without losing much needed benefits. deurbano Dec 2014 #13