Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Riverside protesters struck in hit-and-run [View all]marym625
(17,997 posts)15. Have to prove danger
If no one was causing any damage or attacking and other vehicles didn't do the same, pretty hard to prove.
And the guy in Minneapolis was deliberately running over protesters
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The reason I cautioned readers about the Comments section is that several
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#3
I got your sarcasm loud and clear and was trying to validate it by referencing the
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#7
Heck no, don't like them, won't call them except if the situation is extremely dangerous
Yo_Mama
Dec 2014
#8
If they were slamming on a car, surrounding it...yeah, that's not the right thing to do.
C Moon
Dec 2014
#31
I haven't seen any video of the Riverside one, but the Lake St. in Minneapolis was intentional
Thor_MN
Dec 2014
#45
During the Iraq War, whille I was participating in my neighborhood (at the time) peace
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#32
I never saw that particular piece of filth, but it doesn't surprise me. Even though
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#40
The testimony from eyewitnesses directly refutes your wager. The guy was
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#35