Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Riverside protesters struck in hit-and-run [View all]progree
(12,750 posts)28. "it was a push through, not a hit and run"
Last edited Mon Dec 8, 2014, 01:44 AM - Edit history (1)
You've got quite a way with words!
He plowed right into the crowd at a considerable speed -- too fast for people in the middle to see what was happening and get out of the way, for sure.
[font color = red]On Edit:[/font] I thought you were talking about the Minneapolis Nov. 25 one, which is what's in the video above. Later I noticed your comment was directed at the OP, which is about the Riverside one. I looked at the video in the OP, it doesn't show the vehicle at all, so I can't comment with certainty whether it was a "push through", whatever that is. But any vehicle going into a crowd at faster than 1/2 mph without advance notice is very dangerous! People in the middle of even a small bunch of people have almost no mobility.
As for some of the comments here -- I don't believe in deliberately blocking freeways or intersections either. But more generally, when there is a march of more than a few dozen, the crowd has a momentum, and its impossible for someone in the middle of the crowd to do anything but march along, at least in a short amount of time -- it takes someone in the middle some time to work their way to the outside of the crowd and escape. But if the march is orderly -- marshalls and police blocking off intersections while the crowd marches through -- that's First Amendment to me. Just like regular parades.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The reason I cautioned readers about the Comments section is that several
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#3
I got your sarcasm loud and clear and was trying to validate it by referencing the
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#7
Heck no, don't like them, won't call them except if the situation is extremely dangerous
Yo_Mama
Dec 2014
#8
If they were slamming on a car, surrounding it...yeah, that's not the right thing to do.
C Moon
Dec 2014
#31
I haven't seen any video of the Riverside one, but the Lake St. in Minneapolis was intentional
Thor_MN
Dec 2014
#45
During the Iraq War, whille I was participating in my neighborhood (at the time) peace
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#32
I never saw that particular piece of filth, but it doesn't surprise me. Even though
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#40
The testimony from eyewitnesses directly refutes your wager. The guy was
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#35