Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Scalia: Nothing In The Constitution Prohibits Torture [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)91. Perfectly NAZI thing to say.
Guy's dad was the proud head of a fascist society before WWII.
Dershowitz on Scalia
He's an interesting guy. His father was a teacher at Brooklyn college when I was there. His father was a proud member of the American-Italian fascist party and got his doctorate at Casa Italiano at Columbia at a time when in order to get your doctorate you had to swear an oath to Mussolini. So he comes from an interesting background and he went to a kind of military school in New York which was a place where many children of fascists were educated. Therefore to call him a conservative - he's never expressed any conservative priniciples - he's a statist. He's a man who is well in the tradition of Franco and Mussolini. Not Hitler. He's not an anti-Semite - there's no bigotry or racism in him at all. But he is somebody who has these views which would have been very comfortable in fascist Italy or fascist Spain.
SOURCE: http://www.eschatonblog.com/2004/05/dershowitz-on-scalia_19.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Prohibition under International Law: Torture in all forms is banned by the 1948 Universal...
uhnope
Dec 2014
#28
I'm not understanding the notion that "there's nothing in it to rule out torturing prisoners for
The Stranger
Dec 2014
#6
I disagree the primary purpose of torture is to terrorize the populous. Do you want to protest
Vincardog
Dec 2014
#42
The Amendment refers to Punishment - actions as the result of conviction & sentence.
24601
Dec 2014
#86
Not only does the Constitution prohibit 'cruel' punishments it prohibits 'unusual' ones. n/t
PoliticAverse
Dec 2014
#9
I wish he could be removed from his seat on the court as comments like this are prejudicial imo. nt
cstanleytech
Dec 2014
#12
Why doesn't that old coot simply retire? His sadistic impulses are becoming far too
Cal33
Dec 2014
#17
Just what we'd expect from the Supreme Court Justice who went hunting with Dick Cheney.
Judi Lynn
Dec 2014
#18
This is the Koch Court. They don't get to retire without cement galoshes. Still mischief yet to do.
freshwest
Dec 2014
#89
Maybe not you old fool but have you ever heard of the Geneva Conventions? We lead the fight to
jwirr
Dec 2014
#37
The US signed on to a treaty against torture, it is now the Supreme law of the land. Article VI
alfredo
Dec 2014
#45
Cruel and unusual seems to come to mind (Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution)
Omaha Steve
Dec 2014
#56
I can't stand this fucking guy and he is wrong and he likely knows he is wrong. He is so God damn
Jefferson23
Dec 2014
#62
Scalia is privy to the Whimsy Amendment. It's only available to the PTB, like himself.
valerief
Dec 2014
#64
Well we sure have had to put up with him and his asinine comments for all these years, and that is a
still_one
Dec 2014
#76