Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Police: 9 shot at Tenn. nightclub Christmas party [View all]jimlup
(8,010 posts)17. Well actually I would recend the 2nd Amendment
I honestly would. I also think it would be a sensible political way to proceed. We are deluding ourselves if we think the "Bill of Rights" 10 Amendments are somehow "sacred".
Sure - I'll fight to the death for the 1st but certainly not the 2nd. It is just antiquated. And I know that I'm not alone so I'll just watch you guys who support the 2nd and shake my head in sorrow for the many dead all for the cost of an antiquated idea which applies to a society which doesn't exist in the United States today.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Criticizing something that you can't even quote looks amazingly week as a debate tactic
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#26
If insisting that we consider the actual 2A when discussing the 2A qualifies as dogmatism
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#43
They are refuting your ignorant, arrogant claims that you have failed to support with evidence.
PavePusher
Dec 2011
#74
I agree. 4% who can't venture out of house without a gun or two will whine and argue irrationally.
Hoyt
Dec 2011
#31
Apparently not all of us live in a different world. We all live in a strange world.
Starboard Tack
Dec 2011
#36
That statement might have some credibility if you had a legitimate source to back it up.
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#34
No, I'm telling you that even a single anecdote outweighs your unsupported claim...
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#75
You've referred twice to "primary sources" in this sub-thread but haven't named one yet
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#80
A nation in which a large portion of the population is banned from owning guns or anything else
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#83
According to your links, all gunners over 45 years of age need to turn in your guns.
Hoyt
Dec 2011
#62
You obviously didn't read your own link that said the "militia" includes people UNDER 45.
Hoyt
Dec 2011
#78
Nothing in the Constitution or the law makes militia membership a pre-requisite for owning a gun
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#81
So, Second Amendment mention nothing about "militia." So why did you post link in first place?
Hoyt
Dec 2011
#85
No, it says that the militia is important, and that an armed populace is a prerequisite...
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#86
i agree, there are far more powerful weapons today, should people have access to drones to defend a
JI7
Dec 2011
#40
Let me get this straight. An off duty police officer shot 9 people claiming he saw a gun? Yikes.
rhett o rick
Dec 2011
#32