Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
11. Part of the problem is they starve to death... in the wild.
Sat Apr 14, 2012, 03:38 AM
Apr 2012

Horses don't have natural predators per se in North America (I imagine mountain lions take one down on occasion) and they are an invasive species introduced to the continent like pigs (another destructive invasive species) only a few centuries ago. They've not found their natural balance with the environment here and thus, go through boom-and-bust cycles in their populations, never mind the harm they do putting pressures on native species or open range ranching, all relying on the same sometimes meager vegetation of the western states. It's a similar principle as when ranchers and states cull wolves: They upset a balance and allow the populations the wolves were controlling to become unstable. People who like to romanticize feral horses are flirting with hypocrisy because they won't give the same fawning consideration to feral cats (yet another even more destructive invasive species). Exterminating wild horses is a completely unpalatable option. Leaving them to their own devices only results in their suffering and the suffering of native species and of Humans who rely on the vegetation the wild horses consume in copious amounts leading to... starvation. Controlling their numbers is the only acceptable and humane option. What is done with the meat afterwards is not my concern. I don't eat horses, I don't eat dogs, I don't eats bugs, I don't eat squid, I don't eat a lot of things that other people do. Who am I to tell them they can't? And who are you?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Obviously Valley Meat Co. Sees A Market DallasNE Apr 2012 #1
There has been a market for some time Major Nikon Apr 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author antigone382 Apr 2012 #15
Here here, Major Nikon kurtzapril4 Apr 2012 #18
I grew up on a farm, and had chickens as pets when I was 5 Major Nikon Apr 2012 #20
The way the meat companies are going eventually I'll be PatrynXX Apr 2012 #2
That logic assumes that many consumers have not seen their animals slaughtered OmahaBlueDog Apr 2012 #7
good. Voice for Peace Apr 2012 #3
There is only so much capacity in rescues, and demand/need for horses is plummeting OmahaBlueDog Apr 2012 #4
or the wild. alp227 Apr 2012 #8
Part of the problem is they starve to death... in the wild. DRoseDARs Apr 2012 #11
+12,000! n/t kurtzapril4 Apr 2012 #19
simply put: therealsuzn Apr 2012 #23
The native populations died out over 12,000 years ago; were separate from their Eurasian cousins... DRoseDARs Apr 2012 #24
I don't think the wild needs imported horse meat. nt. harmonicon Apr 2012 #13
Do the right thing. Seedersandleechers Apr 2012 #5
Why? people eat horse. Odin2005 Apr 2012 #9
I hope we have cloned meat soon. nt ZombieHorde Apr 2012 #10
....yes, to serve up with the Android Vegetables, Inc. Gibby Apr 2012 #12
Funny. Though I think cloned meat would eventually be cheaper ZombieHorde Apr 2012 #21
one woman was the leader in shutting down the last one in the usa madrchsod Apr 2012 #14
As I remember it the production was moved to Mexico where conditions for the animals were much worse Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #17
Is this Repub Gov going for national exposure? duhneece Apr 2012 #16
Join the club PlanetBev Apr 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New Mexico governor asks ...»Reply #11