Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Police: 9 shot at Tenn. nightclub Christmas party [View all]Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)33. Just to be clear - you have zero proof of that claim. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Criticizing something that you can't even quote looks amazingly week as a debate tactic
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#26
If insisting that we consider the actual 2A when discussing the 2A qualifies as dogmatism
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#43
They are refuting your ignorant, arrogant claims that you have failed to support with evidence.
PavePusher
Dec 2011
#74
I agree. 4% who can't venture out of house without a gun or two will whine and argue irrationally.
Hoyt
Dec 2011
#31
Apparently not all of us live in a different world. We all live in a strange world.
Starboard Tack
Dec 2011
#36
That statement might have some credibility if you had a legitimate source to back it up.
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#34
No, I'm telling you that even a single anecdote outweighs your unsupported claim...
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#75
You've referred twice to "primary sources" in this sub-thread but haven't named one yet
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#80
A nation in which a large portion of the population is banned from owning guns or anything else
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#83
According to your links, all gunners over 45 years of age need to turn in your guns.
Hoyt
Dec 2011
#62
You obviously didn't read your own link that said the "militia" includes people UNDER 45.
Hoyt
Dec 2011
#78
Nothing in the Constitution or the law makes militia membership a pre-requisite for owning a gun
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#81
So, Second Amendment mention nothing about "militia." So why did you post link in first place?
Hoyt
Dec 2011
#85
No, it says that the militia is important, and that an armed populace is a prerequisite...
slackmaster
Dec 2011
#86
i agree, there are far more powerful weapons today, should people have access to drones to defend a
JI7
Dec 2011
#40
Let me get this straight. An off duty police officer shot 9 people claiming he saw a gun? Yikes.
rhett o rick
Dec 2011
#32