Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Berkeley (MO) officials: Man killed by police had pointed gun at officer [View all]billhicks76
(5,082 posts)79. I'm Not Contesting Anything
Just think it's bizarre they cropped the video to "protect the parents". Read the links if you're going to spout.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Berkeley (MO) officials: Man killed by police had pointed gun at officer [View all]
alp227
Dec 2014
OP
For a short time there was a radio station that played "all Elvis, all the time."
JEFF9K
Dec 2014
#1
I live in the St. Louis media market, and I've seen no 'cropped footage'.
ColesCountyDem
Dec 2014
#15
This is the living proof that an indictment should have come from the Michel Brown grand jury.
Half-Century Man
Dec 2014
#8
Not necessarily that an indictment should have issued from the MB Grand Jury, but that
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#29
Yeah, that soiled everything. Whether the fix was in or not, every new incident will now be suspect
Doctor_J
Dec 2014
#33
Even if one accepts every word of this 'official narrative' as gospel, it still raises
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#19
No, it's not a 'false premise' but then I can tell from the thrust of your remarks
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#24
The words of our colleague Feral Child partially console and quiet me often nowadays:
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#30
WRT to Myers, that's funny, as eye- and earwitnesses to his shooting had Myers
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#39
You have erected so many straw men one hardly knows where to begin or whether the endeavor
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#48
If Myers could not identify the officer, and fired only because of a generalized fear of "brigands,"
branford
Dec 2014
#53
You say summarily executed, have any proof of that, other than an as yet un-named "witness"?
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#47
Actually there were 2-3 witnesses (eye- and ear-), all of whom independently
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#49
Sigh. If I do all the legwork and spend the time to re-establish what was already
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#60
There is no way in hell this shooting has been ruled 'justified' by anyone who
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#61
And you have no proof, beyond your obvious bias, that Flanary was operating as some sort
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#63
The link you yourself provided upthread provides more than simply that "Flanary doesn't
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#68