Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama says drug legalization not answer to cartels [View all]bluedigger
(17,438 posts)50. Beating the Drug-War Addiction
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 paradoxically reinforced the US militarys focus on countering illicit drug traffickers. While other US forces became heavily involved in the war on terrorism, USSOUTHCOM scaled up its war on drugs, with its commanders targeting the industrys bosses in the Andes, Mexico, and Central America.
That happened in part because, following 9/11, Latin America was the only region of the world that did not witness an attack by transnational terrorists linked to al-Qaeda, so there seemed to be little need to pursue counter-terrorist activity there. And, with the US continuing to be the worlds largest market for illegal drugs, its leaders focus on the drug war in Latin America does not appear misguided, at least not on the surface.
That focus has not only made USSOUTHCOM a major recipient of federal funds, but has also turned it into something akin to an autonomous drug-fighting agency. From the regions perspective, USSOUTHCOM appears to be a vaguely independent military arm of US policymakers global anti-drug strategy, with scant accountability or congressional oversight, and with significant resources for aggressive anti-drug operations.
Indeed, USSOUTHCOM has controlled 75% of the more than $12 billion that the US government has allocated to anti-drug activities in Latin America and the Caribbean since 2000. But, despite this expensive military campaign, all evidence shows that the war on drugs has been a fiasco.
http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/beating-the-drug-war-addiction
That happened in part because, following 9/11, Latin America was the only region of the world that did not witness an attack by transnational terrorists linked to al-Qaeda, so there seemed to be little need to pursue counter-terrorist activity there. And, with the US continuing to be the worlds largest market for illegal drugs, its leaders focus on the drug war in Latin America does not appear misguided, at least not on the surface.
That focus has not only made USSOUTHCOM a major recipient of federal funds, but has also turned it into something akin to an autonomous drug-fighting agency. From the regions perspective, USSOUTHCOM appears to be a vaguely independent military arm of US policymakers global anti-drug strategy, with scant accountability or congressional oversight, and with significant resources for aggressive anti-drug operations.
Indeed, USSOUTHCOM has controlled 75% of the more than $12 billion that the US government has allocated to anti-drug activities in Latin America and the Caribbean since 2000. But, despite this expensive military campaign, all evidence shows that the war on drugs has been a fiasco.
http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/beating-the-drug-war-addiction
Thanks for posting that handmade34. I found the above at the same source. It looks like there is a lot of good reading there!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For Obama, its worse to be seen as soft on crime than endorse legalization n/t
AZ Progressive
Apr 2012
#11
From the posts here, I would again suggest The President Has a Growing MJ Problem
FlaGatorJD
Apr 2012
#92
Did you notice that the GOP has open season on him no matter what he does?
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2012
#18
sorry but he's not really a stand up kind of guy on many issues the public is ahead with nt
msongs
Apr 2012
#34
sorry, President Obama, but you are wrong on that one...we've had 50 years of War on Drugs...
rfranklin
Apr 2012
#3
Ever since the Willie Horton ads, politicians have been afraid to be seen as soft on crime n/t
AZ Progressive
Apr 2012
#9
No, hes just not suicidal enough to agree that making drugs legal may be the answer.
cstanleytech
Apr 2012
#27
The fact that he's open to listening to the other leaders on this is huge imo
Voice for Peace
Apr 2012
#45
The stupid thing here is, the William Bennett types he's trying to appease with this stance
Ken Burch
Apr 2012
#23
'He said the responsibility also rests with countries that are big destinations for the drugs
EFerrari
Apr 2012
#32
Sigh. He knows he's wrong. He's not an idiot. He just doesn't want to pick this battle.
SunSeeker
Apr 2012
#35
Not to mention without the support of both houses he cant overturn the federal laws regarding
cstanleytech
Apr 2012
#43
I agree the policy has failed and will likely continue to fail however that doesnt make him an
cstanleytech
Apr 2012
#44
I live in a state that won't be in play. I have the luxury of considering third party candidates.
Comrade Grumpy
Apr 2012
#52
Exactly. He can't get congress to pass infrastructure improvements. Legal heroin? Pfft.
SunSeeker
Apr 2012
#68
Obama's Christian beliefs are so strong they inform his policy choice on gay marriage..
Fumesucker
Apr 2012
#82