Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)

16. Yes, I did miss the imaginary "constitutional requirement"

Reply to msanthrope (Reply #13)

Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:07 AM

Jan 2015

you have been blathering about that Obama, in the case of Gallagher, was "forced" to appoint a Republican when he didn't actually have to.

Funny how you so far haven't been able to cite it yourself. Funnier even that you claimed that it was Mary Jo White who nominated Stiglitz to the HFT panel when it was actually someone else.

But not as funny as the fact that you're on these boards.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nobel Laureate Stiglitz Blocked From SEC Panel After Faulting High-Speed Traders [View all] brentspeak Jan 2015 OP

Why are you blaming President Obama for following the law with Gallagher's appointment? msanthrope Jan 2015 #1

You are aware there are more than 2 political parties in this country? brentspeak Jan 2015 #2

Dude...Mary Jo White is Independent. The next time you critique the President you might msanthrope Jan 2015 #5

So, logically, Obama appointed yet another Republican for the commission brentspeak Jan 2015 #7

Did you miss the constitutional requirement, brent? And aren't you trying to have it both ways? msanthrope Jan 2015 #8

Either you didn't do well in school brentspeak Jan 2015 #9

As I noted, brent...missed the constitutional requirement, yeah??? Try reading your own msanthrope Jan 2015 #13

Yes, I did miss the imaginary "constitutional requirement" brentspeak Jan 2015 #16

Brent....go back to post #7, and read the constitutional requirement. You msanthrope Jan 2015 #17

That was my own post you're referring to brentspeak Jan 2015 #18

Yes brent....your own post. And it contains a constitutional requirement. This is not msanthrope Jan 2015 #20

So I am going to assume you've given up....here's the answer.... msanthrope Jan 2015 #22

But somehow it is expected that a Democrat can support the Corporate agenda right? Vincardog Jan 2015 #3

What does that even mean? nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #6

Stiglitz should be RUNNING the SEC (or Treasury). Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #4

My ideal team would have Krugman at Treasury, Elizabeth Warren running the SEC, tclambert Jan 2015 #12

What would Goldman think? That seems to be the litmus test for decision making on financial policy. pa28 Jan 2015 #10

What would Teddy Roosevelt (or Pres. Sanders or Warren) do? I think they'd put Stiglitz in charge of Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #11

No the truth is they can't handle the itellegence of one of our best economic minds. That is why jwirr Jan 2015 #14

High-Speed Traders? No 1step Jan 2015 #15

Can there be no one who is critical... blackspade Jan 2015 #19

Damn. elleng Jan 2015 #21