Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:26 PM Jan 2015

This Letter Could Restart The Case Against Darren Wilson [View all]

Last edited Thu Jan 8, 2015, 02:05 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: Think Progress website noting NAACP letter

The NAACP Legal Defense Fund* wrote an open letter to Missouri Judge Maura McShane asking her to investigate Ferguson prosecutor Bob McCulloch and his team for misconduct. The NAACP notes that, under Missouri law, McShane has the authority to investigate McCulloch and appoint a new special prosecutor to handle the case against Darren Wilson. Such a move would effectively restart the case against Wilson for killing Michael Brown, after no charges were filed against Wilson during last year’s grand jury proceeding.

1. McCulloch and his team “knowingly presented false witness testimony to the grand jury.” McCulloch admitted this on a radio interview on December 19. The NAACP notes this is likely a violation of the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct. Specifically, McCulloch allowed a woman to testify as an eyewitness who he knew was not at the scene of the incident and had a history of “racially-charged rants about the incident on the internet.”

2. McCulloch and his team “presented incorrect and misleading statements of law to the grand jury and sanctioned unlawful juror practices.” Specifically, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Kathi Alizadeh distributed copies of a Missouri statute that was contravened by a Supreme Court decision 30 years earlier. When Alizadeh addressed the issue weeks later she said that the statute was “not entirely incorrect or inaccurate” but the grand jury should “disregard” it. At other times, Ms. Alizadeh seems genuinely confused about what legal standards were at issue and shared her confusion with the grand jury, including this remarkable exchange:




Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/01/06/3608333/naacp-demands-judge-investigate-ferguson-prosecutor/



This is the picture of the actual transcript. (I didn't know if I was allowed to post it up top)


[br]

[font size=6]UPDATE[/font]

These items were brought to our attention, appearing to have substantial relevance.

NOTE - The Titles are also direct links to the items.

[br]
[center][font size=4]NAACP VICTORY - DEATH IN CUSTODY REPORTING ACT PASSES THE U.S. SENATE[/font][/center]
[br]
Late last night, on Wednesday, December 10, 2014, the United States Senate passed, with strong bipartisan unanimous support, NAACP-supported H.R. 1447, the Death in Custody Reporting Act. This important bill passed through the U.S. House of Representative in December of 2013 on a bi-partisan voice vote.

The legislation, which now must be signed into law by President Obama, is strongly supported by the axiom, “in order to manage a problem, you must first be able to measure it.” It will require states to report to the U.S. Department of Justice information on every instance in which a person dies while in the custody of a law enforcement official, including: (1) the name, gender, race, ethnicity, and age of the deceased; (2) the date, time, and location of death; (3) the law enforcement agency that detained, arrested, or was in the process of arresting the deceased; and (4) a brief description of the circumstances surrounding the death. Having this information in one central location will enable us to study trends and compare the records of jurisdictions, so that we may begin to see where there is and is not a problem. It will go a long way to not only understanding the phenomenon of the deaths of Americans while in custody, but also may also begin to alleviate the environment of suspicion, concern and mistrust that currently exists in many racial and ethnic minority communities across America today by providing much-needed transparency in our Nation’s criminal justice system.

[br][hr][br]
[font size= 4]Legal Advocacy Group {NAACP} ask for new Darren Wilson grand jury[/font]

What is key about this Los Angeles Times story, is the fact that it details the a significant issue that the letter to the Judge, requesting an independent review of the Grand Jury affairs by McCulloch, is from the NAACP legal defense fund (which is totally independent from the NAACP itself).

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund -- which shares a name similar to the NAACP but is an independent advocacy group -- made the request in a letter to Circuit Judge Maura McShane and also asked her to appoint a special prosecutor.


[br][hr][br]
[font size=4]Letter is Just one of 3 Complaints Lodge concerning Ferguson Grand Jury[/font]

Also reflected by the Los Angeles Times, is the fact that the NAACP Legal Defense Fund is just one of three separate complaint avenues utilized in the week.

1. The NAACP Legal Defense Fund

2. Grand Juror has sued McCulloch in federal court

3. Seven St. Louis Residents filed Bar Complaint against McCulloch
[br]
The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund's letter came the same day that a grand juror sued McCulloch in federal court for the right to speak publicly about the prosecution's "muddled" and unusual handling of the case.

Seven St. Louis-area residents also filed a bar complaint against McCulloch with state professional regulators Monday, alleging McCulloch's office breached ethical rules by presenting incorrect legal standards and questionable testimony.

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund echoed many of the residents' complaints. (You can read the Los Angeles Times' article on the grand juror's lawsuit and the citizens' bar complaint against McCulloch here.)
[br]
[hr][br]
[center][font size=5]LINK to Actual NAACP LDF Letter[/font][/center]

Actual Letter (PDF format) from NAACP Legal Defense Fund
http://www.naacpldf.org/files/case_issue/NAACP%20LDF%20Open%20Letter%20to%20Judge%20Maura%20McShane.pdf
[br][br]
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
are we allowed to edit the excerpt with html (to supply the links as exact in the story)? laserhaas Jan 2015 #1
I think you are fine with the way you've posted this. NYC_SKP Jan 2015 #40
Thanks. laserhaas Jan 2015 #42
Where is the Justice Department's investigation? yeoman6987 Jan 2015 #2
IMO the DOJ was there, simply to calm things down. laserhaas Jan 2015 #3
The Federal Grand Jury continues to meet. If a state prosecution restarts, then the Federal one msanthrope Jan 2015 #14
The Federal Grand Jury continues to meet. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #13
Also - is it consider wrong - for me to insert {NAACP} into the title laserhaas Jan 2015 #4
What matters is conveying the information accurately and as simply as possible. Voice for Peace Jan 2015 #10
Okay. Just think it would garner more attention if NAACP was titled laserhaas Jan 2015 #11
Glad so many are trying to right this terrible wrong! BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #5
Good job NAACP!. I hope it works. Vattel Jan 2015 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2015 #25
Wow what a non-answer underpants Jan 2015 #7
K ^ R - Awesome. This needs to happen. nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #8
That exchange between the Grand Juror and D.A. Alizadeh is unfuckingbelievable. SunSeeker Jan 2015 #9
Does double jeopardy come into play if prosecutor knowingly presented false testimony? still_one Jan 2015 #12
No. There was no trial. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #15
Thanks still_one Jan 2015 #18
Wilson never wasn't charged with anything and didn't have a trial. Gore1FL Jan 2015 #19
no problem, I appreciate the detail still_one Jan 2015 #20
No jeopardy attaches in grand jury proceeding Gothmog Jan 2015 #26
Jeopardy never attaches to a grand jury proceeding Recursion Jan 2015 #34
There was no jeopardy at all since there was 'no bill'. brush Jan 2015 #41
And that such a prosecutor give a dang about seeking what's right and true laserhaas Jan 2015 #43
I think the main reason for the current lawsuit is to allow grand jury testimony NV Whino Jan 2015 #16
Manifest Injustice - stares U.S. right in the face laserhaas Jan 2015 #17
I sure hope so but won' hold my breath. BeanMusical Jan 2015 #21
This is Palin-worthy gibberish! Congrats to Ms. Alizadeh! pnwmom Jan 2015 #22
Ha Ha "Palin-worthy gibberish" laserhaas Jan 2015 #23
Reminds me of something that could also have come off donald rumsfeld's twisted tongue. calimary Jan 2015 #44
wow...the hits keep coming laserhaas Jan 2015 #45
Oh man, that loon! calimary Jan 2015 #46
awh..man....Now I'm going to have to laserhaas Jan 2015 #47
, blkmusclmachine Jan 2015 #24
I think this is great except... Kalidurga Jan 2015 #27
concur! laserhaas Jan 2015 #28
the naacp is out for justice hopemountain Jan 2015 #29
Prosecutors and Judges have Impunity by Law FreakinDJ Jan 2015 #31
I hope it reopens the investigation and also leads to an investigation of McCullogh davidpdx Jan 2015 #30
It would be nice if the Democratic Party... malokvale77 Jan 2015 #32
Yeah, it would davidpdx Jan 2015 #33
At the least... malokvale77 Jan 2015 #35
It's a misjustice in this country for people to just stand Madmiddle Jan 2015 #36
K & R Thespian2 Jan 2015 #37
very strange and stupid, this bombing stuff. laserhaas Jan 2015 #38
that word salad of ms. alizadeh's was worthy of our favourite grifter. niyad Jan 2015 #39
UPdates noted above - were brought to my attention laserhaas Jan 2015 #48
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»This Letter Could Restart...