Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GreatGazoo

(4,635 posts)
35. Please tell the cameras aren't supplied under a deal with producers of Fox's "COPS"
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 10:04 AM
Jan 2015

They are going to get footage of people being killed by tasers, then what ?

and it won't take long before that happens. Here is one week's worth...

868. October 2, 2014: Michael Daryle Rose, 49, Flagstaff, Arizona
869. October 4, 2014: Lashano J. Gilbert, 31, New London, Connecticut
870. October 6, 2014: Iretha Lilly, 37, Waco, Texas
871. October 6, 2014: Balantine Mbegbu, Phoenix, Arizona
872. October 7, 2014: Daniel Tyson, 30, Hollywood, California


http://truthnottasers.blogspot.com/2008/04/what-follows-are-names-where-known.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kind of like Keefer Jan 2015 #1
Agreed LP2K12 Jan 2015 #2
yes Locrian Jan 2015 #6
Cops argue that videos don't show all of the story. Downwinder Jan 2015 #9
Those ingenious LAPD cops. Why, what ever will they think of next? Here's a hint of what's KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #10
Shoot him with your revolver - no troublesome camera. Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2015 #14
Your post got me wondering Keefer Jan 2015 #15
I see a lot (some?) of chicago cops with revolvers. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2015 #21
OK, firearm then. But if they say their life was thretened and shot somone - no camera on! Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2015 #26
Why not have them run all the time??? DetlefK Jan 2015 #3
On DU, not long back, medical privacy was mentioned Trillo Jan 2015 #7
What if the camera runs while the cop takes a shit? Or while you take a shit? DetlefK Jan 2015 #11
Not seeing someone take a shit versus protecting above-the-law killers? Trillo Jan 2015 #12
You are going down a slippery-slope pretty fast. DetlefK Jan 2015 #16
It is the lack of justice that occurs with cops killing people that has created the slippery slope, Trillo Jan 2015 #20
You didn't read my earlier post. DetlefK Jan 2015 #23
I did read that post. I was just debating. Trillo Jan 2015 #25
If recording cops dropping a deuce is gonna save lives... Iggo Jan 2015 #17
Sigh. DetlefK Jan 2015 #24
Who gives a shit? Iggo Jan 2015 #27
Okay, big man. Come and prove that you don't give a shit. DetlefK Jan 2015 #31
How did you make that jump? Iggo Jan 2015 #33
You sounded like you don't care about people's pivacy. DetlefK Jan 2015 #34
It would most likely take a court order to get to any video. Ikonoklast Jan 2015 #29
It really depends on the particular state. Xithras Jan 2015 #30
I have a feeling there is a new hysteria going on on DU. DetlefK Jan 2015 #32
they should be on at all times! n/t wildbilln864 Jan 2015 #4
At.All.Times. Iggo Jan 2015 #28
Interesting, but it seems like that's a little too late. Why not activate the camera petronius Jan 2015 #5
So we'll get no context. Just what happens when the taser is fired. NYC Liberal Jan 2015 #8
rec for exposure, not for turning on cameras after tazing. They should be uppityperson Jan 2015 #13
Still not sure what the point is nichomachus Jan 2015 #18
It's like the director yelling "ACTION!" Pull out that taser and put on your best show. Ed Suspicious Jan 2015 #19
good. samsingh Jan 2015 #22
Please tell the cameras aren't supplied under a deal with producers of Fox's "COPS" GreatGazoo Jan 2015 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»L.A. police to get Tasers...»Reply #35