Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

inanna

(3,547 posts)
18. Good Guardian write up about this:
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 11:23 AM
Jan 2015
House Democrats swiftly kill a quiet Republican plot to protect Wall Street

Yesterday, Congressional Republicans tried to pull a fast one.

Just hours after being sworn in for the 114th Congress, House Republicans introduced a bill with an Orwellian title --“The Promoting Job Creation and Reducing Small Business Burdens Act,” – complete with its own social media campaign under the (as it turns out, ironic) hashtag “#FreeMainSt.”

The legislation was a melange of 11 bills – all meant to weaken regulation of banks and the financial industry – that were written in the last session of Congress and never went anywhere. The new Frankenbill of loose ends was wrapped into a neat package and presented to a new Congress without debate.

House leaders put this hastily arranged bill, H.R. 37, onto the floor on one day’s notice, without going through the Financial Services Committee or giving members the opportunity for amendment. They wanted a quick, quiet passage on the second day of the session, teeing it up for the new Republican majority in the Senate to tackle.

Link: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/jan/08/house-democrats-swiftly-kill-a-quiet-republican-plot-to-protect-wall-street
Boner's 1st failure in the newest congress. Oh the next 2 yrs will be fun. :D DRoseDARs Jan 2015 #1
Great to know the F.U.D. over this bill becoming law is over. n/t freshwest Jan 2015 #2
GOP used a procedure called a "suspension" that requires a 2/3 vote. SunSeeker Jan 2015 #3
Thanks Soapbox.. did they do it by mistake? Why would they think 2/3 would vote for this. Cha Jan 2015 #10
Out of hubris and stupidity. They thought they could get away without debate. SunSeeker Jan 2015 #21
YES good news but kacekwl Jan 2015 #4
It's the first full day of the new Congress with a Republican-controlled Senate. PoliticAverse Jan 2015 #6
35 Democrats voted for and 1 Republican voted against... PoliticAverse Jan 2015 #5
Are you saying 35 Dems actually voted to weaken Dodd Frank? 2banon Jan 2015 #8
It looks that way to me. n/t progree Jan 2015 #9
Including Graham and Ashford, the only two D's who beat Republican incumbents this cycle Recursion Jan 2015 #12
Including MY congresscritter nitpicker Jan 2015 #15
And perhaps just as significantly... Orsino Jan 2015 #17
suspension of rules DCBob Jan 2015 #7
Thank you for that. But why did the Republicans do this? Was it a mistake? rhett o rick Jan 2015 #20
Arrogance, impatience and stupidity DCBob Jan 2015 #22
Probably done as a test vote BumRushDaShow Jan 2015 #23
The reason for doing the suspension is procedural; the bill isn't recommitted Recursion Jan 2015 #11
Bend Over StevePaulson Jan 2015 #13
Outstanding! another_liberal Jan 2015 #14
ok under suspension of the rules thank you. here's more for those who dont know. belzabubba333 Jan 2015 #16
Good Guardian write up about this: inanna Jan 2015 #18
Recommend. n/t Jefferson23 Jan 2015 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. House fails to pass ...»Reply #18