Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
36. Attachment of Wages for Students loans are subject to two FEDERAL restrictions
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 12:27 AM
Jan 2015

Firs, the Federal law restricts ANY attachment of wages (Except Child Support) to no more then 25% of your total Income. In your case this is the MINOR rule for it restricts any attachment to $200 a month on income of $800 a month.

The Second FEDERAL rule on wage attachment is you MUST be left with 30 times the Federal minimum wage on a weekly bases. Federal Minimum Wage is $7.15 a hour. $214.50 a week or $858.00 a month. Now the $858 per month can be reduced by any taxes due, including Income Taxes, Social Security Tax, wage tax, AND Union Dues AND Child Support payments (Through MOST states exempt anyone earning less then $800 a month from Child Support, thus rarely imposed on people earning less then $800 a month if that is all you can earn). Student loans are NOT among the list or exceptions thus any wage attachment must leave you at least $858 a month, less taxes and union dues. Furthermore Child Support Payments are superior claims to any other debt in many states.

If your income is less then $858 a month, tell the creditor to go pound salt, tell them your income is less then what is attachable by FEDERAL LAW.

One way to look at who is poor is to look at the US Poverty level for one person which is $11,650 a year or $970.33 a month.

https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/federal-poverty-level-FPL/

Another gauge is the "Standard of Need" which is what Congress determined a person needs to receive to survive. This was calculated in 1967 and Inflation indexed. In 2015 it is $733, which is what the Federal Government pays Supplemental Security Income (SSI) to those people who can NOT work do to disabilities.

http://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/SSI.html

Remember the $733 is what a person can get on SSI. Since 1967 the Federal Government has said it will pay 50% of whatever a state pays its welfare recipients up to that Standard of Need. While all State's Welfare payments are subject to that 50% copayment by the Federal Government, but NO State has even taken those payments up to the Standard of Need Maximum. In my home County the Welfare payment is $174 a month (the Federal Government pays $87.50 of that).

A third way to look at "poverty" is US Housing law, and its definitions of "Low Income", "Low Low Income" now call "Very Low&quot and "Low, Low Low, Income" (Extremely low Income). These terms came out of the reform of Federal Public Housing in 1974. Prior to 1974 it was IMPOSSIBLE for a person on Welfare to get into most Public Housing in the US. Public Housing Agencies demand that people had a steady income and employment, thus cutting out people on Welfare. To counter this Congress invented the Terms "Low Low Income" and "Low, Low, Low income" and required Public Housing Agencies to prioritize these lower income people.

Here is a National Data Base on what is now called "Very Low" and "Extremely Low" income:

http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/il/il14/index_il2014.html

For Example in Bangor Maine 80% of Low Income is $35,150, VERY LOW is $21,950 and Extremely Low ia $13,200.

Just pointing out there is not just one way to look at poverty.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

In my lifetime I have known many very wealthy people. Mr.Bill Jan 2015 #1
I would consider myself very wealthy OnePercentDem Jan 2015 #12
Sounds like you're doing it right. Mr.Bill Jan 2015 #13
I think I have OnePercentDem Jan 2015 #14
I'm retired now Mr.Bill Jan 2015 #15
fuck these 54%. For those with money who understand that roguevalley Jan 2015 #39
Thank you. Mr.Bill Jan 2015 #41
Agree but OnePercentDem Jan 2015 #67
I agree. Mr.Bill Jan 2015 #74
Absolutely OnePercentDem Jan 2015 #85
You always have to take care of wealth; knowledge takes care of you. pokerfan Jan 2015 #33
Words of Good seveneyes Jan 2015 #65
How did you see a plaque on a communication satellite? yurbud Jan 2015 #79
The rich get things "for free" all the time.. whathehell Jan 2015 #57
Don't forget the corruption that wealth christx30 Jan 2015 #66
Oh yes, and, in fact, even without blatant corruption whathehell Jan 2015 #68
I was reading a post today on christx30 Jan 2015 #84
As a nine-nine-percenter myself, I will say that I appreciate your perspective mazzarro Jan 2015 #59
I'm sorry, but I must take issue with something you've said.. whathehell Jan 2015 #69
it sounds like you built the wealth yourself. I bet a lot of those polled inherited it yurbud Jan 2015 #78
Our poor just aren't poor enough. leftyladyfrommo Jan 2015 #97
Some of them have cell phones! KamaAina Jan 2015 #102
Sometimes I wonder about that. leftyladyfrommo Jan 2015 #103
Everyone does well when everyone does well. The rich are oblivious to the needs of those struggling YOHABLO Jan 2015 #2
Oh yes! Turbineguy Jan 2015 #3
Time for a minimum guaranteed income? Trillo Jan 2015 #4
We already have one. For bank$ters. n/t jtuck004 Jan 2015 #23
Time for asset-stripping the Oscenely Wealthy Demeter Jan 2015 #61
As the workplace shifts away from skilled working class jobs, we may need one. n/t Adrahil Jan 2015 #71
Wealthiest Americans are assholes Orrex Jan 2015 #5
Yeah, and I'm sure wealthy NON-Americans, like Rupert Murdoch, perhaps are just brilliant.. whathehell Jan 2015 #64
Murdoch has been a US Citizen since 1985 n/t Adrahil Jan 2015 #72
Did he renounce his Australian citizenship, or is his dual? whathehell Jan 2015 #75
Oh, completely agree... I just failed to suppress my pedantic tendencies. :) n/t Adrahil Jan 2015 #76
Okay, no problem! whathehell Jan 2015 #89
Well, since the OP didn't comment on wealthy NON-Americans, I figured I could leave them out Orrex Jan 2015 #80
Really? Are they sure? Are they really, really sure? onehandle Jan 2015 #6
+1 bravenak Jan 2015 #11
Thank you. jwirr Jan 2015 #21
We'll need more than three. JEB Jan 2015 #29
+2 Pharaoh Jan 2015 #32
+ 3 eom BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #52
Perfect lake loon Jan 2015 #60
Then they must want to be poor, and should advocate for a much higher tax rate on the wealthy. Scuba Jan 2015 #7
Thanks to our fair and balanced media, the poor have become scapegoats for the corrupt rich who whereisjustice Jan 2015 #8
Any one of them is welcome to trade places with me. Downwinder Jan 2015 #9
Simple fix: Sell all that thou hast, and give to the poor. Qutzupalotl Jan 2015 #10
Just curious, who are the "wealthiest americans"? hughee99 Jan 2015 #16
"This report is based on Pew Research Center data collected as a part of the center’s American jtuck004 Jan 2015 #20
Based on this, it seems like a a good bit of what they're calling "rich" isn't what hughee99 Jan 2015 #40
Interesting. Both Democrats and Republicans mixed up in the "most" or "more" financially secure jtuck004 Jan 2015 #46
Happiness is a great wealth, I would value my friends and family above that of Thinkingabout Jan 2015 #17
What qualifies as poor? davidthegnome Jan 2015 #18
+1 shireen Jan 2015 #26
Attachment of Wages for Students loans are subject to two FEDERAL restrictions happyslug Jan 2015 #36
Catch 22 trap CountAllVotes Jan 2015 #49
These people are as stupid as the people who vote against themselves. I am calling for one of jwirr Jan 2015 #19
+1 nt Live and Learn Jan 2015 #48
I've done 7 years of solo caretaking and it feels like it took 20 years off of my life. adirondacker Jan 2015 #50
My little lady is now in a foster home but I am going through the aftereffects of caretaking without jwirr Jan 2015 #63
a quote that says it all DonCoquixote Jan 2015 #22
They sound like they are from a Lucky Ducky cartoon. daleo Jan 2015 #24
Especially this one Art_from_Ark Jan 2015 #34
That nails it. daleo Jan 2015 #92
How many of the rich see no problem with the navy building a bigger aircraft carrier? Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #25
It depends on where their investments lie... NancyDL Jan 2015 #28
Some have been obsessed with the idea that the Third World is going to rise up against them.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #37
You could argue . . . Brigid Jan 2015 #38
People used to earn a middle class income from a factory job.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #42
Absolutely. Unions and New Deal policies made it possible from the 50's thru the early 80's whathehell Jan 2015 #73
I was in Michigan in the 70s when the UAW was at it's peak.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #82
Amazing...My husband's dad worked for Chrysler. whathehell Jan 2015 #88
The unions were often infiltrated by people who could be bought.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #91
To quote the great Dr. Edward de Bono... NancyDL Jan 2015 #27
Most of these so called very wealthy people onecaliberal Jan 2015 #30
Hey, now at least we know the % of rich people that are Republican assholes. AZ Progressive Jan 2015 #31
yep,,,,, Welfare Easy street... Cryptoad Jan 2015 #35
Assholes. SoapBox Jan 2015 #43
Talk about "without doing anything in return" tblue Jan 2015 #44
Romney comes to mind. AngryDem001 Jan 2015 #45
Has he ever told us how many jobs that "job creator" has created? IronLionZion Jan 2015 #56
A lot of them actually think what they do is "work" IronLionZion Jan 2015 #55
totally out of touch, imthevicar Jan 2015 #47
The poor may be entitled to government benefits, but those benefits do not allow them to get ahead. Vinca Jan 2015 #51
I Think It Is Ignorance RobinA Jan 2015 #96
Those wealthiest Americans should trade places and see IronLionZion Jan 2015 #53
In the study being discussed, the "wealthiest" Americans aren't just the 1%, hughee99 Jan 2015 #98
If they really believe that, then by all means, make them put their money where their big mouths BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #54
This illustrates pretty clearly a lack of empathy & self absorbtion KittyWampus Jan 2015 #58
Raise the minimum wage and millions less will need Gov. benefits to survive. Sunlei Jan 2015 #62
They need to raise the minimum wage to $15 donna123 Jan 2015 #70
Anecdotal Bullshit RunInCircles Jan 2015 #83
Bananas are usually 0.69/lb where I live donna123 Jan 2015 #93
sure, because spending hours in line, in offices, filling out paperwork, trying to meet niyad Jan 2015 #77
The Rich Man and Lazarus 47of74 Jan 2015 #81
Living in the wasteland of the free ashling Jan 2015 #86
Scrooge is alive and well du_grad Jan 2015 #87
"poor people today have it easy because they can get government benefits airplaneman Jan 2015 #90
Yup. Spending all day driving their fancy cars and eatin steak and lobster off those snap benefits. adirondacker Jan 2015 #94
If those who think that could only walk a mile in a poor man's shoes tawadi Jan 2015 #95
Those Wealthy Who Believe this are Fucken Fox News Addicts or Totally Uninformed Jerks Stuart G Jan 2015 #99
Well isn't that a huge collective maxrandb Jan 2015 #100
The poorest Americans say... bravenak Jan 2015 #101
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Wealthiest Americans say ...»Reply #36