Latest Breaking News

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)

59. you started out with "women," now you've changed it to "feminists"

Reply to ismnotwasm (Reply #58)

Sat Jan 10, 2015, 12:36 PM

Jan 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Congress Introduces A National Abortion Ban On Its Very First Day Back [View all] riversedge Jan 2015 OP

Just as we expected. They can't wait to get control over women and their bodies, even if they have Arkansas Granny Jan 2015 #1

What is it about Republicans that makes them think this way? Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2015 #46

Fundamentalists deserve the hell they fear. eom uppityperson Jan 2015 #2

Yes. Demoiselle Jan 2015 #26

While I'm opposed to any ban on abortions, the headline is false..... George II Jan 2015 #3

Agree. beaglelover Jan 2015 #13

Trust women and doctors, and you won't have to hedge your words. Hekate Jan 2015 #18

+1 nt brer cat Jan 2015 #20

Very, very well put. enlightenment Jan 2015 #25

Well LincolnsLeftHand Jan 2015 #30

Okay. enlightenment Jan 2015 #33

I also agree ... brett_jv Jan 2015 #55

"Legal limits" were written into Roe vs Wade from its inception. Hekate Jan 2015 #61

I disagree. Chemisse Jan 2015 #56

Thank you for the polite enlightenment Jan 2015 #60

As my repugnance toward second trimester abortions increases with the passing weeks of gestation, Chemisse Jan 2015 #62

I think enlightenment Jan 2015 #64

Thank you, Hekate. Control-Z Jan 2015 #52

+1000 ismnotwasm Jan 2015 #57

Needlessly sensational headlines that link to the same needlessly sensational headline are OK at DU. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #14

Roe v. Wade already bans it at 22 weeks for all intents. joshcryer Jan 2015 #34

I agree as well lancer78 Jan 2015 #37

You know what leads to more later-term abortions? Making it more difficult to get one in the first nomorenomore08 Jan 2015 #41

Glad to hear it nichomachus Jan 2015 #4

nothing new here. PatrynXX Jan 2015 #5

They'll get all the controversial /scary crap out of the way early, so it won't C Moon Jan 2015 #6

+1. Not like the Media ever holds the GOP responsible for any of its reprehensible behavior. Nope. blkmusclmachine Jan 2015 #31

Fuck these fuckin.... Burf-_- Jan 2015 #7

Thanks for moving the dialog forward . . . Journeyman Jan 2015 #11

What else can you say? BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #15

There really has been no dialog in decades, has there? I agree with Burf on this. nt Mnemosyne Jan 2015 #17

yep fuck em dembotoz Jan 2015 #49

Burf speaks for a lot of us Skittles Jan 2015 #51

I can't believe this baloney. Be seem to be going backward. Paper Roses Jan 2015 #8

"Am I angry?" handmade34 Jan 2015 #22

I agree completely. Time to shuttle these assholes off to the old folks' home. nomorenomore08 Jan 2015 #42

+1000 smirkymonkey Jan 2015 #63

Rep Adrian Smith, R Nebraska, has also introduced legislation to REPEAL Dodd-Frank misterhighwasted Jan 2015 #9

Rep Kevin Yoder, R Kansas, has started the process KansDem Jan 2015 #23

Is this the same Wall St./Dodd-Frank Bill that also FAILED today? Hope so. misterhighwasted Jan 2015 #24

In a Republican Congress, "science" is what they agree upon (facts and research be damned). . . Journeyman Jan 2015 #10

I wanna see JEEZUS!!! riding a dinosaur... easychoice Jan 2015 #53

They sure are having fun on their checklist.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #12

Now that Democrats are in their comfort zone of the minority BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #16

The only way they can ban abortion.... gerogie2 Jan 2015 #19

Agree but this constant nicking at riversedge Jan 2015 #21

There's plenty of ways to ban abortion without literally banning abortion. jeff47 Jan 2015 #54

Fetal pain. Unborn child. Ban abortion. Neon Gods Jan 2015 #27

Maybe they are pacing themselves. Turbineguy Jan 2015 #28

It may pass the House, but the whole thing is a fucking show davidpdx Jan 2015 #29

Or if, heaven forbid, it makes it through the Senate, this will happen anyway: freshwest Jan 2015 #32

I thought clinton was the first feminist president, also the first black president, if i recall NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #35

Not to women. freshwest Jan 2015 #36

well now, that depends, apparently. NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #38

I wasn't talking about Clinton. Perhaps you didn't read my post: freshwest Jan 2015 #39

well then there's only one other thing you can mean and i suggest you don't speak for NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #40

No ismnotwasm Jan 2015 #58

you started out with "women," now you've changed it to "feminists" NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #59

Right! "not to women", fresh.. very important to them. Cha Jan 2015 #43

Mahalo for the link to "President Obama-the First Feminist President".. nice to go back and read Cha Jan 2015 #44

It won't make it through the Senate davidpdx Jan 2015 #45

Yes indeed, riversedge. This is one of the MANY differences. nt SunSeeker Jan 2015 #47

Wow, the GOP really have too much time on their hands, don't they. rstanleyj2918ca Jan 2015 #48

+1, I agree, wish for retribution. uppityperson Jan 2015 #50