Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Burf-_-

(205 posts)

2. really???

Reply to Omaha Steve (Original post)

Mon Jan 12, 2015, 11:31 AM

Jan 2015

It seems to me they ask for more and more rights to take away our rights. They want blood now ? Isn't that something only a qualified medical technician/EMT, nurse, or doctor can do ? I suppose the full on cavity/strip search in public will be requested next. I am not inclined to thank SCOTUS though.... their recent track record is despicable. Thomas and Scalia should be impeached.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court won't hear dispute over DUI blood tests [View all] Omaha Steve Jan 2015 OP

I don't like the idea of it being possible to forcibly stick a needle in someone with no warrant. Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #1

that would be virtually impossible to do with any scientific precision dsc Jan 2015 #3

That seems like a bad idea if convictions are based on projections JonLP24 Jan 2015 #5

I'm pretty sure that .15 is 5 times higher than .03. nt. hedda_foil Jan 2015 #8

.015 is lower than point .03 JonLP24 Jan 2015 #9

really??? Burf-_- Jan 2015 #2

Idaho invented this "blood draw by cops" shit years ago jmowreader Jan 2015 #10

Hence the lower court decision stands: elleng Jan 2015 #4

Texas is nasty Scalded Nun Jan 2015 #6

It gets worse RandiFan1290 Jan 2015 #11

Where I live they have judges on call 24/7. former9thward Jan 2015 #7