Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren: I'm not running for president [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)88. Seriously? You think that's a recommendation?
She only runs for things when pushed and shoved?
I think when she answers NO to the question "Are you going to run?" that NO means NO. There comes a point when insisting that someone do what they say, over and over again, that they aren't going to do, takes on a tone that I find to be awkward at best.
The lack of respect accorded to my Senator, as though she is some nitwit who can be pushed and bullied, and she does not know her own mind, astounds me!
She also, along with the rest of the women in the Senate, signed the letter urging Hillary to run. So, even though she "takes on Hillary" on this matter or that, I'm quite certain they agree way more than they disagree.
Howard Dean has issued a formal endorsement of HRC, too. I think maybe it's time to be realistic. If Warren is running for anything, it's Secretary of the Treasury or Fed Chair in the Clinton Administration. And Dean? He's in a good place to be HHS.
Although you say Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are the only politicians who are running .. the fact remains that neither Warren nor Sanders ARE running--Warren has said, now, yet again, that she is not going to run, and last time Sanders spoke, he said he'd only run if he could win. She has said NO for the umpteenth time, and he hasn't announced.
Toying with running IS a way to get people to notice you. It's also a way to drive conversation to issues that you care about. And sometimes, that's all it is.
It's 2015. The election is next year. Neither one of those Senators has a dime in a campaign war chest. It's time to start injecting a bit of reality into the process. Warren has said--yet again--the big N word...NO. I think it's time that people believe her. Sanders seems to be sliding away from an announcement, but it's still too soon to tell with him--I wouldn't hold my breath on him running, or if he did run, staying in past the first primary debate.
Jim Webb is still exploring, so there's an option if you like that brand (not my speed, but YMMV).
I'll stick with Clinton. If she doesn't run, Biden will jump in. I think she's running, though, and I think she will announce some time in April of this year.
I think when she answers NO to the question "Are you going to run?" that NO means NO. There comes a point when insisting that someone do what they say, over and over again, that they aren't going to do, takes on a tone that I find to be awkward at best.
The lack of respect accorded to my Senator, as though she is some nitwit who can be pushed and bullied, and she does not know her own mind, astounds me!
She also, along with the rest of the women in the Senate, signed the letter urging Hillary to run. So, even though she "takes on Hillary" on this matter or that, I'm quite certain they agree way more than they disagree.
Howard Dean has issued a formal endorsement of HRC, too. I think maybe it's time to be realistic. If Warren is running for anything, it's Secretary of the Treasury or Fed Chair in the Clinton Administration. And Dean? He's in a good place to be HHS.
Although you say Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are the only politicians who are running .. the fact remains that neither Warren nor Sanders ARE running--Warren has said, now, yet again, that she is not going to run, and last time Sanders spoke, he said he'd only run if he could win. She has said NO for the umpteenth time, and he hasn't announced.
Toying with running IS a way to get people to notice you. It's also a way to drive conversation to issues that you care about. And sometimes, that's all it is.
It's 2015. The election is next year. Neither one of those Senators has a dime in a campaign war chest. It's time to start injecting a bit of reality into the process. Warren has said--yet again--the big N word...NO. I think it's time that people believe her. Sanders seems to be sliding away from an announcement, but it's still too soon to tell with him--I wouldn't hold my breath on him running, or if he did run, staying in past the first primary debate.
Jim Webb is still exploring, so there's an option if you like that brand (not my speed, but YMMV).
I'll stick with Clinton. If she doesn't run, Biden will jump in. I think she's running, though, and I think she will announce some time in April of this year.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am a Bernie person, but would go with Liz or Hillary...per my other post here though
randys1
Jan 2015
#4
That is what I thought...I think she makes a big mistake not running, even if she
randys1
Jan 2015
#11
Right! The handful of people responding to a DU post are MUCH more representative...
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#72
Just like the Presidential Polls in 2012 mistakenly indicated that Obama would win...
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#77
I don't agree. I think they are both confident women who don't shy away from challenges.
MADem
Jan 2015
#100
Bwah! That particular little swipe is soooo yesterday. And getting a bit tattered, eh? n/t
djean111
Jan 2015
#65
Regardless of the source of money, either they can raise enough to win or they cant
randys1
Jan 2015
#38
<<The real question is could Liz get the same amount of money that Hillary could, and she must have
Cal33
Jan 2015
#85
So if Warren is the ONLY acceptable candidate...and Warren isn't running...then...
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#51
I've been listening to and watching politics for 62 years. It will surprise me greatly if Warren
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#54
Sherrod Brown would be great for VP, but he does not have the voice and the commitment
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#46
Only two people have the integrity and the history to say what Elizabeth Warren suggests will
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#45
I do not hate Hillary. I just don't think she will make a good candidate or a good president.
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#102
Given John Podesta's recent announcement, I don't think you're going to get your wish.
MADem
Jan 2015
#103
I always believed her. I guess she just doesn't want to run or be president or both.
hrmjustin
Jan 2015
#37
Maybe we should set up a separate forum for all of these Warren is/isn't running posts?
George II
Jan 2015
#39