Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: President Obama Will Seek to Reduce Taxes for Middle Class [View all]Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)112. Excellent analysis.
This definitely sets the stage for 2016, by leaving the Republicans with no one else to blame for not cutting the taxes for the Middle Class . . .after they have said that taxes are too high for the last 6 years!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
162 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Much preferably when they are in the majority, not when the most Republican Congress since 1928
merrily
Jan 2015
#52
Do you even understand how the drastic tax cuts on the wealthy have hurt the middle class?
raindaddy
Jan 2015
#118
And mine is about YOUR disingenuous suggestion that we COULD return to 1950's tax rates...
VanillaRhapsody
Jan 2015
#134
No....but you disingenuously want to blame this President for doing something about it....
VanillaRhapsody
Jan 2015
#139
No one here says it has....but please do tell us how YOUR campaign plans to magically turn it all
VanillaRhapsody
Jan 2015
#135
They are already in action, having been sworn in to office on January 13th.
Major Hogwash
Jan 2015
#113
Too bad Obama won't fight for it. Boner will come in and give him that orange scowl, and it'll be
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2015
#3
Yep. NO points for proposing measures you know are doomed from the get go. Sorry!
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2015
#7
False. Google the time period--and this time, count Kennedy's place holder, who would have voted
merrily
Jan 2015
#136
The time there were 60 in the Dem caucus exceeded 24 days by a lot and a placeholder handpicked
merrily
Jan 2015
#142
No, no link = no link period. And you wonder why I didn't leap to google for you on command?
merrily
Jan 2015
#146
As a reply to my Post 144, your Post 145 was a lie and now your Reply 155 lied about Post 145.
merrily
Jan 2015
#158
There is nothing liberal about indefinite detention or drone killing innocent people.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#29
The ACA, auto bailout, and Recovery Act were not "kowtowing" to the Republicans. nt
SunSeeker
Jan 2015
#39
I agree, but those don't make up a "liberal agenda" when weighed against the items
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#71
Do you disagree? Do you think his stands on torture, indefinite detention and NSA domestic
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#74
I agree with your list but it's hardly a "liberal agenda" when weighed against the
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#72
Some people have a very loose definition of the term "liberal". If you support Wall Street
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#89
Some people think that if they are liberal on one or two issues, then they are liberal.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#120
What if you support only the portion of wall street that handles union pension plans? Aren't there
24601
Jan 2015
#130
Not sure if I understand your take, but some are willing to support Wall Street
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#133
+1000. Obama's sock puppets come here w/their phony 11-dimensional chess BS, but we're not fooled,
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2015
#107
Obama already pushed for a tax cut and also raised taxes on the rich in 2013.
Drunken Irishman
Jan 2015
#41
How about his first SIX years, during all of which Democrats were in the majority.
merrily
Jan 2015
#54
So yesterday they attack him for not proposing this, now that he has, they attack him for not
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#58
It's either that or he's stupid and thinks it'll pass a Republican legislature
Fearless
Jan 2015
#30
Dems had a filibuster-proof 60 seats for only 24 work days, and they weren't even consecutive.
SunSeeker
Jan 2015
#26
Does it take more than 24 days to get all Dems together to vote for tax reform?
Fearless
Jan 2015
#28
Sadly, it's not just the "other side" making that claim, as this thread shows. nt
SunSeeker
Jan 2015
#36
The "it's about time" and "why did he wait until now" comments are particularly amusing
NYC Liberal
Jan 2015
#23
And Republicans will seek to raise them on the middle class and the working poor
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#78
Is this empty jest-ure supposed to make me forget he's pushing TPP behind the scenes?
Ferd Berfel
Jan 2015
#82
Corporate Farmers are thrilled with his idea of disallowing stepped up basis
cpamomfromtexas
Jan 2015
#104
Pic URL: https://jahanc.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/obama-laughing-on-af1.jpg
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2015
#106