Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

iandhr

(6,852 posts)
2. I am glad that an ally like the UK has independent nuclear capability.
Mon Jan 26, 2015, 01:01 AM
Jan 2015

People like this have their heads in the clouds. However I would be all for reducing the number of nukes (e.g. START with Russia) When it comes to the power to destroy the world once is enough.

I am against the building of a doomsday machine however.

"RAND strategist Herman Kahn proposed a "Doomsday Machine" in 1960 that would consist of a computer linked to a stockpile of hydrogen bombs, programmed to detonate them all and bathe the planet in nuclear fallout at the signal of an impending nuclear attack from another nation. The key aspect of the doomsday device's deterrent factor is that it would go off automatically without human aid and despite human intervention, providing a highly credible threat that would dissuade attackers and avoid the dangerous game of brinkmanship that brought the United States and the Soviet Union closer to nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_device

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Scrap Trident nuclear pro...»Reply #2