Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: The Obama administration wants to dramatically change how doctors are paid [View all]Hoyt
(54,770 posts)39. It's relative. Keeping a person with diabetes healthy is more challenging.
There are ways to adjust payments for a patient's baseline condition. It's really not difficult, just different. Scares some folks.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Obama administration wants to dramatically change how doctors are paid [View all]
DonViejo
Jan 2015
OP
I agree. What criteria do they use? There are some conditions where patients do not get better in
still_one
Jan 2015
#76
And all those years in school and the studying of difficult material and then the many years
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#55
they make more money then you think. even an old school vet I worked for made 3k every 10 pets
Sunlei
Jan 2015
#72
funny how you LLI's are saying this...when that is EXACTLY what they do in Europe!
VanillaRhapsody
Jan 2015
#31
Some tests are not necessary, as in the case of my father, blood test showed
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#5
i didnt, after 2 visits we switched, but it took about 7 days to switch through the insurance co.
SummerSnow
Jan 2015
#86
And if one is female, the standard is tell them it's psychomatic, IOW, you are hysterical...
freshwest
Jan 2015
#33
I personally have Blue Cross and medicare. So yes it is for profit and there is someone else
LiberalArkie
Jan 2015
#20
Fortunately there would be adjustments for baseline status. You'd get more for treating
Hoyt
Jan 2015
#29
Okay. But I think this sounds like education reform with all the testing scores that mean nothing.
jwirr
Jan 2015
#26
I would hope so. But as I said - she is never going to get better. She is getting older and we are
jwirr
Jan 2015
#34
It's not nearly as simple as you think. Some people are chronically ill and won't
pnwmom
Jan 2015
#40
They will get severity adjusted payments. There are systems available right now to handle that.
Hoyt
Jan 2015
#44
I think if you read up on reimbursement systems that reward outcomes, you'll feel better about it.
Hoyt
Jan 2015
#48
In France, I had the impression that the doctors were paid on salaries in some cases.
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#59
I think we better worry about how to change the delivery system to improve outcomes, not
Hoyt
Jan 2015
#61
I think you are asking a very good question that would apply to millions of people,
pnwmom
Jan 2015
#38
More of O's micro-managing/means testing, but this time, targeting doctors instead of public schools
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2015
#53
An ice floe would kinder and more honest. "Sick" and poor Medicare patients will not be able
McCamy Taylor
Jan 2015
#54
an excellent idea-many who are on Medicare and Medicaid do NOT receive the best care
Sunlei
Jan 2015
#71
i think it is about time we used all the data locked up in the medicare system.
mopinko
Jan 2015
#73
As a Physician Assistant practicing clinical medicine in the primary care setting,
Aristus
Jan 2015
#78
Undoubtedly. There are so many variables in the practice of medicine that there can't be
Aristus
Jan 2015
#82
There are definitely "best practices" for most situations. Unfortunately, some docs don't
Hoyt
Jan 2015
#90