If anything, it sinks it further.
The comments cited speak for themselves: if he is credible, they are fact; if they are not fact, he is not credible.
And let us be clear, Sir: by endorsing his credibilty, this is what you are endorsing as statements of fact....
"An investigation into the details of the massacre on more than 40 protesters in the Ukrainian city of Odessa, who rejected to recognize the legality of the US / EU backed post-coup government in Kiev. This photo and video documentation was compiled by the editor of Strategic Culture Foundation and reveals that the massacre was a premeditated act of mass murder a mass casualty event, consistent with NATO Unconventional Warfare Doctrine. Text edited by nsnbc. Viewer discretion is advised Christof Lehmann, editor-in-chief, nsnbc international."
"The perpetrators set the scene as typical in Hollywood-style US/NATO/Israeli false flag operations. The massacre in Odessa, the arrangement of the bodies, is bearing the hallmarks of a mass casualty event consistent with US/NATO unconventional warfare doctrine."
"Note: according to one of the main versions of what happened on May 2 in Odessa, the Right Sector thugs performed a false flag operation. They put St. Georges Ribbons (symbols of anti-Maidan federalism supporters) and organized violent provocations against Maidan supporters (i.e. against their own allies), in order to later blame anti-Maidan supporters and make them look responsible for death of such many people."