Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
21. We did not attack the Afgan people.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 05:34 PM
Jan 2012

The Taliban protected Bin Laden in AFGHANISTAN. They and AL Qaeda are the targets in Afghanistan, not the Afgan civilians. Afghanistan has not had a serious government in a few hundred years. Its no surprised the "people" of Afganistan has no idea 9/11 occurred.

The 9/11 attacks were planned and carried out GLOBALLY. The leaders of those who funded it, and carried it out, were in AFGHANISTAN.

And WOW ... really ... 15 or the 19 attackers were from Saudi Arabia ... OMG ... I had NO IDEA!!!!!



And I did not say we should have occupied Afghanistan for 10 years. But I can see your confusion. Bush went in, spent about 20 minutes there, and then went into Iraq, leaving a token force in Afghanistan which lacked the resources to clean up that mess.

So when Obama becomes President ... Afghanistan has not changed much from when Bush first invaded, in fact, it probably got worse because Bush's shift in focus allowed the Taliban and Al Qaeda to move in and out of Pakistan even more freely.

Now, thanks to Obama ... OBL is dead (which should have happened YEARS ago) and most of the AQ leadership also gone ... and Obama is starting to reduce our presence there too.

The bastard!!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

shhhhhhhhhh! hush now! look, over there, shining city on a hill lol nt msongs Jan 2012 #1
Perhaps because he's trying to end them? Whatever will anyone whail about babylonsister Jan 2012 #2
America is a warmongering nation and our fascination with death a destruction is sickening Cali_Democrat Jan 2012 #3
I guess as long as Special Ops aren't called wars, all is well, or better yet - use drones. sad sally Jan 2012 #9
The next generation of Drones cbrer Jan 2012 #11
How is Obama thanking the troops praising war?? center rising Jan 2012 #4
I'd like to think Laura would let the vets speak for themselves cliffordu Jan 2012 #5
Here's some of what they've said: sad sally Jan 2012 #7
AHEM... cbrer Jan 2012 #10
Once again, you've nailed it. Guess the naive part of my brain wants to believe someting - sad sally Jan 2012 #12
Many things cbrer Jan 2012 #13
In America, we've learned how to pick fights and claim the existence sad sally Jan 2012 #14
Of course you're right cbrer Jan 2012 #15
I am very torn about this thread. (kinda long) cbrer Jan 2012 #6
Your observations are spot on - especially the last sentence. sad sally Jan 2012 #8
I must have missed where Obama ran as a pacifist. JoePhilly Jan 2012 #16
Nothing missed there, far from a pacifist, only against "dumb wars" sad sally Jan 2012 #18
Iraq was a dumb war. JoePhilly Jan 2012 #19
The Afghan people weren't and still aren't any threat to the United States - it's the second poorest sad sally Jan 2012 #20
We did not attack the Afgan people. JoePhilly Jan 2012 #21
I'm not confused - just happen to see history in a different way than you. sad sally Jan 2012 #22
Yea, we don't agree. JoePhilly Jan 2012 #23
I think he was praising "those who serve", not war bhikkhu Jan 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Not a Peep About the Pres...»Reply #21