Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
11. I think his rationale is that we need a president who is for the 99%.
Sat Dec 27, 2014, 11:31 AM
Dec 2014

IMO, if he caucuses with the Democrats, and votes with them, and, likely, votes FOR them, and is affected by what happens afters elections - then he can criticize. Right now, some Democrats have made the party a place that does not seem hospitable to those who support the traditional non-corporate Democratic platform.
Personally, the "D" on the jersey does not mean as much as it used to, to me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"I think many of the Democratic candidates did not run on an agenda which resonated with working djean111 Dec 2014 #1
Possibly, but who is Sanders to criticize? He's not a Democrat!!!! George II Dec 2014 #7
That literally has fuck all to do with what he said. Going after the messenger is djean111 Dec 2014 #8
BIG difference - he's criticizing Democrats and presumably going to use that.... George II Dec 2014 #10
I think his rationale is that we need a president who is for the 99%. djean111 Dec 2014 #11
If you read Elizabeth Warren's book, A Fighting Chance, you read this explanation about the JDPriestly Dec 2014 #13
+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #15
That. And I'll raise you a huge shitload! Elmer S. E. Dump Dec 2014 #46
a good quote DonCoquixote Dec 2014 #17
uh.... Aquavit Dec 2014 #25
Born in Brooklyn and lived in NYC area all my life (67 years)! George II Dec 2014 #29
Why the Canadian flag, then? Ken Burch Dec 2014 #37
Not that it's any of your business, but it's a tribute to my mother.... George II Dec 2014 #42
It wasn't meant as a hostile question. Sorry. Ken Burch Dec 2014 #43
I'm not an independent looking for the "republican" presidential nomination! George II Dec 2014 #20
It's enough that he organizes with Dems in the Senate. Ken Burch Dec 2014 #19
"organizing with dems" is one thing, BEING a Democrat is another.... George II Dec 2014 #21
The assumption is that he'd run as a Dem. Ken Burch Dec 2014 #22
Your "obviously" isn't true, but if he runs as a third-party candidate, he'll get no more than 10%.. George II Dec 2014 #23
He's not going to run as an independent presidential candidate. Ken Burch Dec 2014 #24
"And I'd watch it with comments like ... NanceGreggs Dec 2014 #27
But it's in how its said. Ken Burch Dec 2014 #28
Man, you TOTALLY missed the point..... George II Dec 2014 #31
Your whole series of posts there were viciously hostile to Bernie Sanders. Ken Burch Dec 2014 #34
Now it's "viciously hostile" and "venomous"? Please explain yourself. George II Dec 2014 #35
You were implying that he'd go third-party against the Dem nominee. Ken Burch Dec 2014 #36
This gets more bizarre..... George II Dec 2014 #39
Just admit that there's no chance he'd go third-party in '16. Ken Burch Dec 2014 #40
And so it coninues.....when did I say or "imply" that Democrats can't trust him? George II Dec 2014 #41
And exactly "how" was it said, Ken? NanceGreggs Dec 2014 #38
Thank you. George II Dec 2014 #32
Did you see my comment BEFORE the one you isolated as "inflammatory"????? George II Dec 2014 #30
The voters you're talking about won't vote anything but Republican. Ken Burch Dec 2014 #33
If these middle American types you describe can't see the clear message Bernie brings for helping appalachiablue Dec 2014 #45
So if you're not a Democrat you can't criticize rpannier Dec 2014 #47
No, but.... George II Dec 2014 #48
+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #14
OK, Senator.......we await your decision. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Dec 2014 #2
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE NorthCarolina Dec 2014 #3
OK, Bernie, what proof do you need that "we can win this thing"? Let your supporters know. antigop Dec 2014 #4
Translation: he's not running PDittie Dec 2014 #5
The headline (not yours) is a misnomer - it's not a "deadline", and.... George II Dec 2014 #6
With every dollar in Wall St essentially being a vote against Sen. Sanders. raouldukelives Dec 2014 #9
I have two questions for Bernie Sanders. JDPriestly Dec 2014 #12
Bernie should run as a Democrat with Elizabeth as a running mate. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #16
+1 on Hillary. She'll run to Obama's right. And lose. blkmusclmachine Dec 2014 #26
Sounds like, absent a massive uprising of checkbook waving acolytes, he's backing away. MADem Dec 2014 #18
Of course his positon is that he wants to win. Nobody can launch a credible campaign for President Douglas Carpenter Dec 2014 #44
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Bernie Sanders Announces ...»Reply #11