Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)Elizabeth Warren Turns The IBM Stock Hit Job On Her Into A Total Fail [View all]
During a recent appearance on Current TV, Elizabeth Warren used her ownership of IBM stock to prove once again why there is no comparison between her and Mitt Romney.
SNIP (video here)
When Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren was asked about her stock holdings specifically IBM by Jennifer Granholm, she said, The IBM stock, yes, we own it. Ive owned it since, it was actually a pretty modest investment made thirty five years ago I think, and the moneys been reinvested. If I were in Congress, Id sell it in a heartbeat. I dont think people in Congress ought to own stock in companies where they can influence the outcomes. Other than that, my retirement funds are held in big mutual funds. Theres no way to influence the outcome of any part of that at least not that I know, but the heart of this is about what our public officials should be doing. I dont think they ought to be trading on insider information, but more importantly, I dont think they ought to be out there influencing potentially their own pocket books when theyre making decisions on behalf of the public.
This question stemmed from a piece in HuffPo a few days ago that read more like a hit job on Elizabeth Warren than investigative journalism. Elizabeth Warren never said that she wasnt rich, but that she wasnt a wealthy individual with a big stock portfolio. Her statement was not in the same ballpark as Mitt Romneys claims that he is unemployed too, or that he has feared losing his job.
It may come as a shock to some, but a person can have money, and still be a strong advocate for those who have less. The big bombshell of the HuffPo story was that Warren owns stock in IBM and is pretty wealthy herself. The difference between Elizabeth Warren and Mitt Romney is honesty. Warren directed stated that she owned the stock and said that she would sell it in a heartbeat. There was no evasiveness in her answer. There was no dodge.
SNIP
Full article (and video) here: http://www.politicususa.com/en/elizabeth-warren-ibm
SNIP (video here)
When Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren was asked about her stock holdings specifically IBM by Jennifer Granholm, she said, The IBM stock, yes, we own it. Ive owned it since, it was actually a pretty modest investment made thirty five years ago I think, and the moneys been reinvested. If I were in Congress, Id sell it in a heartbeat. I dont think people in Congress ought to own stock in companies where they can influence the outcomes. Other than that, my retirement funds are held in big mutual funds. Theres no way to influence the outcome of any part of that at least not that I know, but the heart of this is about what our public officials should be doing. I dont think they ought to be trading on insider information, but more importantly, I dont think they ought to be out there influencing potentially their own pocket books when theyre making decisions on behalf of the public.
This question stemmed from a piece in HuffPo a few days ago that read more like a hit job on Elizabeth Warren than investigative journalism. Elizabeth Warren never said that she wasnt rich, but that she wasnt a wealthy individual with a big stock portfolio. Her statement was not in the same ballpark as Mitt Romneys claims that he is unemployed too, or that he has feared losing his job.
It may come as a shock to some, but a person can have money, and still be a strong advocate for those who have less. The big bombshell of the HuffPo story was that Warren owns stock in IBM and is pretty wealthy herself. The difference between Elizabeth Warren and Mitt Romney is honesty. Warren directed stated that she owned the stock and said that she would sell it in a heartbeat. There was no evasiveness in her answer. There was no dodge.
SNIP
Full article (and video) here: http://www.politicususa.com/en/elizabeth-warren-ibm
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Elizabeth Warren Turns The IBM Stock Hit Job On Her Into A Total Fail [View all]
Tx4obama
Feb 2012
OP
You see that a lot these days. I think they just spellcheck pieces and don't actually
gateley
Feb 2012
#3
Yes -- spellcheck would let these slip through since they're both spelled correctly. nt
gateley
Feb 2012
#19
Warren wants to help those less fortunate than she. Romney just wants to be POTUS. nt
gateley
Feb 2012
#4
Warren worked from a fairly humble childhood. rMoney was born with a golden spoon in his mouth.
geckosfeet
Feb 2012
#12