Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: The Numbers Behind Maureen Dowd's 21-Year Long Campaign Against Hillary Clinton [View all]libodem
(19,288 posts)36. Honestly
It really makes me feel very defensive if anyone else writes anything negative about her. After all she is ours.
Leave Hillary ALONE!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Numbers Behind Maureen Dowd's 21-Year Long Campaign Against Hillary Clinton [View all]
Spider_Mann
Mar 2015
OP
Or else paid like Rush was. Same time frame she began attacking. Part of the huge RW con job.
freshwest
Mar 2015
#3
She has this bad habit of trying to portray herself as some kind of "sex goddess hottie."
MADem
Mar 2015
#4
She's stuck in the high-school "mean girl" mode. Very nasty and full of herself. n/t
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#6
I posted that in tribute to Helen, DFW, not to compare her in any way. Thomas went after criminals.
freshwest
Mar 2015
#10
If she's in the whitehouse, the Senate will only become more Republican in response.
NYC_SKP
Mar 2015
#40
"Media Matters" pushes hard for Hillary 2016, putting its nonprofit status in question...
KoKo
Mar 2015
#18
The Washington Examiner is a right wing rag. Now that I read it i Must take a shower.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#27
No, the point is, your source is dreck, a wingnut, hyperconservative outlet that has one purpose--
MADem
Mar 2015
#35
In what way is Media Matters "anointing Hillary as the ONLY possibility"?
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2015
#42
You are using a right wing publication to defend a falsehood. You've screwed up, here.
MADem
Mar 2015
#44
Huh? I'm not "venting on you." You are bringing a wingnut source here and expecting us to take you
MADem
Mar 2015
#46
So why don't you 'speak as a Democrat', rather than posting Washington Examiner hitpieces?
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2015
#47
Media Matters seems a bit defensive. They did, after all, get a mention in Dowd's article.
NYC_SKP
Mar 2015
#39