Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
3. Nothing new about potash wars:
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 12:20 PM
Feb 2016
War of the Pacific

Even though the 1873 treaty and the imposition of the 10 centavos tax proved to be the casus belli, there were deeper, more fundamental reasons for the outbreak of hostilities in 1879. On the one hand, there was the power, prestige, and relative stability of Chile compared to the economic deterioration and political discontinuity which characterised both Peru and Bolivia after independence. On the other, there was the ongoing competition for economical and political hegemony in the region, complicated by a deep antipathy between Peru and Chile. In this milieu, the vagueness of the boundaries between the three states, coupled with the discovery of valuable guano and nitrate deposits in the disputed territories, combined to produce a diplomatic conundrum of insurmountable proportions.[11]


Over birdshit, basically.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Pacific

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And that is what the war there is about, the potash. nt bemildred Feb 2016 #1
Yep. polly7 Feb 2016 #2
Nothing new about potash wars: bemildred Feb 2016 #3
lots in the 19th c., too MisterP Feb 2016 #4
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»This message was self-del...»Reply #3