Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
31. Check out this paper- its even more extreme now
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:28 PM
Mar 2016
American Exceptionalism in a New Light: A Comparison of Intergenerational Earnings Mobility in the Nordic Countries, the United Kingdom and the United States


We develop methods and employ similar sample restrictions to analyse differences in intergenerational earnings mobility across the United States, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. We examine earnings mobility among pairs of fathers and sons as well as fathers and daughters using both mobility matrices and regression and correlation coefficients. Our results suggest that all countries exhibit substantial earnings persistence across generations, but with statistically significant differences across countries. Mobility is lower in the U.S. than in the U.K., where it is lower again compared to the Nordic countries. Persistence is greatest in the tails of the distributions and tends to be particularly high in the upper tails: though in the U.S. this is reversed with a particularly high likelihood that sons of the poorest fathers will remain in the lowest earnings quintile. This is a challenge to the popular notion of 'American exceptionalism'. The U.S. also differs from the Nordic countries in its very low likelihood that sons of the highest earners will show downward 'long-distance' mobility into the lowest earnings quintile. In this, the U.K. is more similar to the U.S..


Download Info

File URL: http://ftp.iza.org/dp1938.pdf

Download Restriction: no

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

One way to truly access your own house is to visit others. Half-Century Man Mar 2016 #1
That's an excellent article dreamnightwind Mar 2016 #2
Sanders could not do that, it would cost too much for the government to buy the right to have health Baobab Mar 2016 #25
WOW.... very telling article groundloop Mar 2016 #3
The reason for their GDP is pretty simple Major Nikon Mar 2016 #9
how dare they nationalize.. arent they in WTO? Baobab Mar 2016 #19
I think the US would be a much better place had we nationalized our oil reserves at the same time Major Nikon Mar 2016 #20
progressive (irreversible) liberalisation (privatization or disinvestment) Baobab Mar 2016 #22
No, they are doing something wrong, public education. Baobab Mar 2016 #26
I have felt the same way RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #4
Because we are a second world country... awoke_in_2003 Mar 2016 #21
The US has the most profitable private education system in the world Baobab Mar 2016 #23
Profit does not always equal good education. nt awoke_in_2003 Mar 2016 #24
Exactly! thank you. Public Education is theft. Charity is theft. Baobab Mar 2016 #27
Oh, and welcome to DU... awoke_in_2003 Mar 2016 #28
Sarcasm Baobab Mar 2016 #29
Oh, I got it... awoke_in_2003 Mar 2016 #33
Thank you Baobab Mar 2016 #34
Part of the idea is to shake people of those unrealistic expectations Baobab Mar 2016 #40
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Mar 2016 #5
Thanks for reading. I think we all need to move from theory to Lodestar Mar 2016 #12
But wouldn't that be impossible? Baobab Mar 2016 #30
As long as its liberalisation (privatization) it is okay. Baobab Mar 2016 #38
Modeling starvation and a race to the bottom Baobab Mar 2016 #41
I have been to Norway several times for 2-3 week stays-business and pleasure. pangaia Mar 2016 #6
Yes, getting something for in return for taxes.. mountain grammy Mar 2016 #8
Around half. But for that we get more military bang than ALL THE OTHER COUNTRIES COMBINED Baobab Mar 2016 #39
Check out this paper- its even more extreme now Baobab Mar 2016 #31
Norway also has a lot of well-managed oil royalty wealth. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2016 #7
So do we Wednesdays Mar 2016 #18
True, but Norway doesn't have 300 million people to share it with Major Nikon Mar 2016 #42
I love Norway LeftishBrit Mar 2016 #10
Just amazing. And people say Sanders' ideas are "pie in the sky". eom pberq Mar 2016 #11
Probably because Sanders is pretending the last 20 years of WTO and neoliberalism didnt happen Baobab Mar 2016 #32
Absolutely it's a hoot pberq Mar 2016 #43
Globalisation's cure for indigenous workers and their professional protectionism increases profits Baobab Mar 2016 #44
Norway is a country with a population about 2/3 that of New York CITY, and 90+ % of Norwegian.... George II Mar 2016 #13
So you don't think a diverse... scscholar Mar 2016 #35
I said nothing of the kind. Where do you get that from? George II Mar 2016 #36
Good read explaining the situation using Canada as an example. Baobab Mar 2016 #45
What does their descent matter? scscholar Mar 2016 #37
There is a fairly important line in the article: malthaussen Mar 2016 #14
Good points. Remember also 90+% top income tax. Festivito Mar 2016 #17
We're working on that. NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #15
K & R. Great article, thanks. appalachiablue Mar 2016 #16
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»After I Lived in Norway, ...»Reply #31